A Win for the WIN - AFFA Represents Hongyunhonghe Tobacco for a Successful Trademark Non-Use Cancellation in Indonesia

A Win for the “WIN” – AFFA Represents Hongyunhonghe Tobacco (Group) Co. Ltd. for a Successful Trademark Non-Use Cancellation in Indonesia

Trademark, Event, Intellectual Property

When your Trademark Registration application is rejected in Indonesia, it is often due to the existence of another prior Trademark with the same elements that have been registered in the same class with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP). Since Indonesia applies the first-to-file principle, if you register the same Trademark after another Trademark that has been filed or registered earlier, you must consider alternative options to prevent a potential rejection by the DGIP.   The dilemma usually arises when there is an identical prior Trademark that gets in the way of a successful registration, but you have no other option but to still keep using the identical Trademark for business purposes in Indonesia. At times, rebranding exercise costs more than any potential legal action that may be required to cancel a prior Mark due to non-use. In this scenario, the latter should be considered.   As stated in Article 74 of the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law (Trademark Law), an interested third party can apply for cancellation of a registered Trademark in the form of attack legally on the grounds of non-use to the Court of Commerce if the Mark has not been used for trade in goods and/or services for 3 (three) consecutive years from the date of registration or last use.   Therefore, if we can prove that the Trademark is genuinely not in use after a thorough investigation, the Court of Commer can cancel a registered Trademark upon request of an interested third party.   Since 2022, AFFA has been trusted by Hongyunhonghe Tobacco (Group) Co. Ltd., which originates from the People’s Republic of China to manage its Intellectual Property in Indonesia, one of which is the WIN Trademark in class 34 which includes types of cigarette filters, filters for cigarettes, lighters, liquid solutions for use in electronic cigarettes, lighters for smokers, flavorings other than oil essentials for tobacco, cigarettes, electronic cigarettes, snuff and hand-rolling tobacco.   However, based on initial searches, there is already a WIN Trademark under registration no. IDM000030697 in the same class owned by PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company (STTC)  of North Sumatra, Indonesia. Under normal conditions, of course, the client’s chance to register WIN is low because it will be rejected as regulated in Article 21 paragraph (1) letter (a) of the Trademark Law, which states that a Trademark application is rejected if the Trademark has similarities in essence or its entirety with the registered Trademark owned by the other party for similar goods and/or services.   Previously, the WIN Trademark of Hongyunhonghe Tobacco had been registered in China, the European Union, Australia, Brazil, Mexico, South Korea, Cambodia, Vietnam, and even Singapore since 2009. This fact alone already constitutes the definition of “an interested party” as regulated by Article 74 of the Trademark Law.   After the investigation process was carried out, it was found that STTC had not used the Trademark for 3 consecutive years from the date of registration or from the date of last use. Consequently, the petition for cancellation was filed to the Commercial Court – Central Jakarta District Court on September 14, 2023, as regulated in Article 76 paragraph (1) of the Trademark Law. Unfortunately, the Court of Commerce decided to reject the petition. Therefore, the next step was to file a cassation to the Supreme Court on September 27, 2023.   The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia finally decided that the Central Jakarta District Court had misapplied the law, granted our cassation request on January 25, 2024, while canceling the Commercial Court’s decision, and asked DGIP to register the cancellation of the WIN Trademark registration from the General Register of Trademarks and announce it in the Official Trademark Gazette.    You might also want to read: AFFA Represents Trek Bicycle to Win a Trademark Non-Use Cancellation Action in Indonesia This success story is a testament that with thorough preparation and investigation, a non-use cancellation action is possible in Indonesia. Should you need more information about Trademark registration and protection in Indonesia or abroad, please email us at [email protected].

AFFA Represents Trek Bicycle to Win a Trademark Non-Use Cancellation Action in Indonesia

AFFA Represents Trek Bicycle to Win a Trademark Non-Use Cancellation Action in Indonesia

Trademark, Event2 Comments

Since mid-2023, AFFA has been entrusted with handling disputes over the Marlin, Trademark owned by Trek Bicycle Corporation, headquartered in Waterloo, United States. Marlin is Trek’s Trademark for its flagship mountain bike frame.    In its home country, Marlin has been used since 1994 and was registered in 1998 at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, when it was submitted for registration in 2021 via the Madrid Protocol addressed to Indonesia, this Mark was rejected by the Directorate General Intellectual Property (DGIP) as the Trademark Office in Indonesia because it was deemed to have similarities in its essence or its entirety with the registered identical Prior Mark owned by PT Astra Honda Motor since November 2006, and the protection period would have ended in November 2026.   Based on research conducted by independent investigators, it turned out that PT Astra Honda Motor had never used this Trademark for 3 (three) consecutive years from the date of registration or from the date of last use. Due to this fact, a petition to cancel the Marlin Trademark due to non-use was filed as regulated in Article 74 paragraph (1) of the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law (Trademark Law).   Despite an unfavorable decision at the Court of Commerce level, the team at AFFA filed a cassation to the Supreme Court on December 6 and submitted a cassation memo on December 19, 2023. It was finally decided in a deliberation meeting of the Panel of Judges on Tuesday, March 19, 2024, that the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court had misapplied the law and ordered the DGIP to remove the Marlin Trademark under the name of PT Astra Honda Motor.   The most important factor is that the Trademark has not been used in the last 3 (three) years based on the non-use investigation report submitted to the Court of Commerce. Apart from that, the similarity in essence or its entirety, an element of Trademark cancellation, does not need to be explained in the petition. Moreover, it is supported by the fact that the Cassation Respondent/Defendant never appeared at the hearings, even though they had been summoned 3 (three) times. Another helpful point that enhanced the chance of obtaining a favorable decision is the fact that Trek Bicycle Corporation also has registrations for the same Mark in various countries, such as Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Panama, Honduras and others.    Contrary to the popular belief that non-use cancellations in Indonesia are impossible, this decision by the Supreme Court is a proof that non-use cancellations are possible, provided that the plaintiff comes prepared with non-use investigation report and ample additional evidence which suggest legitimate interests in the same Mark. Should you need more information about registering your Trademark in Indonesia or abroad, do not hesitate to email us at [email protected].

Kylian Mbappe has Trademarked His Iconic Goal Celebration - Why is it Possible? - AFFA IPR

Kylian Mbappé has Trademarked His Iconic Goal Celebration – Why is it Possible?

Intellectual Property, Trademark1 Comment

Since 2017, Kylian Mbappé has contributed 170+ goals for the Paris Saint-Germain football club. Since then, Mbappé has introduced a celebration pose with crossed arms clamped in his armpits after he scores. Apparently, the pose was registered as a Trademark in the same year and will be protected at least until August 2027.   In theory, since 2008, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has recognized the existence of ‘New Types of Marks,’ which divides Trademarks into two types, namely Visible and Non-Visible. For Visible Marks, apart from the various commonly recognized Marks such as names, logos, and holograms, Motion or Multimedia Signs, Position Marks, and Gesture Marks are also recognized. Therefore, this celebratory pose, which includes gestures, can indeed be registered as a Trademark. Source: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)   As a logo, there is a classification system that regulates it to make applications more accessible, as well as providing ample opportunity for each person or company logo to be registered in various appropriate class categories, thereby minimizing monopolistic practices. The classification system is the Vienna Class, which divides logos into 29 categories, 144 divisions, 775 main sections, and 1,112 auxiliary sections. Mbappé’s celebration pose is included in Vienna Class 2.1.8 which includes logos for “Acrobats, athletes, dancers, jugglers, nude men, men practising sports (except those already included in Vienna Classes 2.1.2, 2.1.12, 2.1.14, 2.1.20 and 2.1.21).”   It should be noted that the Indonesian Trademark Office (DGIP) has not adopted the Vienna Class for Figurative Mark, but this does not mean that the Mark cannot be registered in Indonesia. Please take a look at the explanation at the end of this article.   Why Does It Need to be Trademarked?   From the start, Mbappé understood that his unique pose could be registered as a Trademark. Dozens of years earlier, David Beckham, the legendary wing midfielder from Manchester United, had registered his cross-passing pose as a Trademark. The difference is that the logo registered by Beckham is a figure that resembles a human (Vienna Class 4.5.5), not a black-and-white photo of himself as registered by Mbappé. Source: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)   However, just like Beckham, Mbappé also hopes that this Trademark can be used commercially for various goods and/or services of his own. With global achievements and 113 million Instagram followers from all over the world, it is not difficult to imagine that whatever Mbappé sells, especially those with his unique celebration logo, will make a profit. Of course, this profit does not only come to Mbappé but also to manufacturers of clothes, textiles, toys, video games, umbrellas, bags, jewelry, perfume, cosmetics, and even toothbrushes who are interested in getting the license.   Negative Impact on the Athlete’s Image?   If a Trademark is already registered, commercial use of the mark becomes the exclusive right of the mark owner or another party who has officially obtained permission. So, suppose another party uses it without permission. In that case, a civil lawsuit can be filed in Indonesia, or criminal liability can be demanded, with a maximum fine of 2 (two) billion Rupiah or a maximum imprisonment of 5 (five) years.   From the perspective of the fan community, the size of this fine can be scary because a logo that was previously very proud, used as wallpaper on a cellphone, laptop, sticker on a vehicle, or poster in the work space could become incriminating evidence. Will Mbappé’s lawyers or legal team sue and imprison the Fans?   The answer is, of course, no. Because they will mainly pursue pirates who produce, distribute, or sell counterfeit products without permission, this effort is undoubtedly very positive for fans who are truly present to provide support to their athletes. Because the money spent will actually be income for the athletes, not put into the pockets of the pirates, it’s more expensive but legal, you get quality goods, and you’re prouder.   Other Athletes Who Have Done It, Too.   The practice of commercializing athletes’ profiles as Trademarks has been going on for a long time; for example, basketball player Michael Jordan, golfer Jack Nicklaus, and sprinter Usain Bolt are still loved by their fans. With the ownership of this celebration logo, Mbappé is recorded as having 7 registered Trademark variants at the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), of which 1 is a Trademark bearing his name, 2 Trademarks contain his favorite slogan, 2 are his logo, and 2 more are a combination of logo and Mbappé’s name.   Lionel Messi (6 Marks) and Cristiano Ronaldo (5 Marks) are other footballers with many active registered Trademarks. However, when David Beckham was still active, he had more Trademarks. Namely, he had 8 registered Trademarks for the logo, name, and several variants of his name with a combination of his back numbers for various products and foundations that he owns. Unfortunately, currently, only one Trademark is still active: BECKHAM.   Can this Trademark be Registered in Indonesia? Referring to Article 1 point 1 of Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications (the Trademark Law), a Trademark is a sign that can be displayed graphically in the form of an image, logo, name, word, letter, number, color arrangement, in the form of 2 (two) dimensions and/or 3 (three) dimensions, sound, hologram, or a combination of 2 (two) or more of these elements to differentiate goods and/or services produced by individuals or legal entities in goods and/or services trading activities.   Referring to the Trademark definition, the Trademark submitted by Kylian Mbappé can also be registered in Indonesia as long as no identical or similar Mark has been previously submitted by another party, as regulated in Article 21 of the Trademark Law. Are you interested in registering your name or favorite pose as a Trademark in Indonesia or abroad? Contact us directly via email: [email protected].

[Important Update] Japan Adopts Letter of Consent for Trademark Registration - AFFA IPR

[Important Update] Japan Adopts Letter of Consent for Trademark Registration

Trademark

The revised Japan Trademark Law will come into effect on April 1, 2024, introducing the “Letter of Consent” to overcome conflicts with earlier Trademark registrations.   However, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) recently announced that evidence must be provided in addition to a consent letter obtained from the earlier registrant when applying Article 4(4) of the Japan Trademark Law. This evidence must convince the JPO examiner that there is no likelihood of confusion between earlier and junior marks, not only at present but also in the future.   Article 4(4) of the Japan Trademark Law, which is newly introduced in April, states:   Trademark applications will not be rejected under Article 4(1)(xi) as long as the applicant obtains consent from the owner of the cited mark and it is unlikely to cause confusion with the cited owner or its exclusive or non-exclusive licensee when used on goods or services designated under the application.   Trademark Examination Guidelines for Article 4(4) Provides:   The requirement of being ‘unlikely to cause confusion’ must be satisfied at the time of the JPO examiner’s decision and in the future. To satisfy the requirement, the following factors will be assessed: Similarity between marks Recognition of mark Uniqueness of mark Significance of mark (House mark or product brand) Possibility of business expansion Relatedness of goods and service Consumers Trade practices involving actual use of mark Where both marks are identical and used on same goods and service, the examiner will find “likely to cause confusion” in principle. Applicant must provide evidence to demonstrate the unlikelihood of confusion based on the actual use of both marks. For example: Different color, font or combination between literal element and figurative element of respective mark Different position to place the mark or to accompany with other distinctive mark Difference in speific purpose or price of respective goods Different sales channel Different seasons to use the mark Different territory to use the mark Mutual covenants to take necessary actions if confusion is likely to occur between the marks An agreement between the parties to keep the present use or configuration of both marks in the future will be required to strengthen the unlikelihood of confusion in the future.   It is important to note that “Letter of Consent” is not available to Trademark applications filed with the JPO before April 1, 2024, even if they are pending examination.   Similarly, international registrations registered at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) or subsequently designated to Japan before April 1, 2024, can’t use the consent. Should you need further information regarding Trademark registration in Japan or other countries, please email us at [email protected].

Enters-Public-Domain-Mickey-Mouse-Stars-in-3-Horror-Films-affa-global

Enters Public Domain – Mickey Mouse Stars in 3 Horror Films?

Copyright, Intellectual Property, Trademark

Enters Public Domain – Mickey Mouse Stars in 3 Horror Films? Mainstream news channels are busy reporting that Mickey Mouse, The Walt Disney Company’s mascot, has entered the Public Domain as of January 1, 2024. As a result, many parties are immediately looking for their fortune by presenting this black mouse in various media. Uniquely, they all have a horror theme!   1. The Vanishing of S.S. Willie Straight released on January 2, 2024, on the Night Signal Entertainment YouTube channel, this is a short film less than 10 minutes long, which assumes that the film “Steamboat Willie” published in 1928, the first film to feature the character Mickey Mouse, is an actual event.   Mickey, Minnie, and other animal characters are displayed in realistic form, covered in retro visuals, but with different names. The horror side is that their story ends tragically at the bottom of the river, contrasting with the cheerful original animated version.   2. Mickey’s Mouse Trap Also released on the same day is a 2-minute trailer for the film, which will be released in March 2024. This time, the story is about a serial killer who wears a Mickey Mouse-like mask and operates in an amusement park.   3. Steamboat Willie The third horror film to utilize Public Domain Mickey is the work of Director Steven LaMorte, who previously directed “The Mean One” (2022), a horror-comedy film inspired by “The Grinch” (2018). Steven admitted that filming of Steamboat Willie will take place this spring, and the concept remains a horror-comedy in the style of The Mean One. Steve confirmed to the media that his work would not violate the law because it would not use the name Mickey Mouse but Steamboat Willie.   4. Infestation: Origins Lastly, Mickey is in a PC game that up to four people can play. Here, you can play as a rat exterminator set in the 80s. But then, you are chased by a monster resembling Mickey Mouse! This game produced by Nightmare Forges can now be ordered on the Steam website, but the official release date has yet to be announced.   What is Public Domain? A work or Creation, including animated films, can be protected by Copyright. Then there is the Copyright Law, which regulates the validity period of Economic Rights, which is a reference for whether we still have to obtain permission from the Creator or Copyright Holder for a Work. If the validity period has passed, the work has entered the Public Domain, and the public can use it freely without asking permission from the Creator.   Why 95 Years Later? The Copyright Law in the United States stipulates that a work’s validity period is during the Creator’s life plus seventy years after the Creator dies. However, this regulation was only applied to all works published starting January 1, 1978. Meanwhile, Steamboat Willie was already present 50 years earlier. That’s why the film still has 95 years of Economic Rights and ends on December 31, 2023. Finally, Steamboat Willie only entered the Public Domain as of January 1, 2024.   Now Everyone is Free to Use Mickey Mouse? Certainly not! Because the only thing in the Public Domain is Mickey Mouse in Steamboat Willie: the Black and White Mickey without gloves. What also needs to be remembered is that as a character, two types of Intellectual Property (KI) are attached to Mickey Mouse: Copyright and Trademark.   If a copyright has an expiration validity period, then a trademark can be renewed every ten years. Mickey Mouse is a registered Trademark still owned by The Walt Disney Company. That’s why none of the works above that use Public Domain Mickey use the name “Mickey Mouse.” They consciously did not use this name to avoid legal disputes. They only dare to use “Mickey” or “Steamboat Willie,” common names not registered by anyone.   So, even though Steamboat Willie has entered the Public Domain, that doesn’t mean you are free to produce and/or sell products that contain colored versions of images or words of Mickey Mouse. The point is that Public Domain doesn’t necessarily make your own Mickey Mouse.   Mickey Mouse Still Owned by The Walt Disney Company Amid widespread news related to the Public Domain, the role of the media is needed to educate people so as not to create new problems. Because incomplete reporting can make many parties who are less aware of IP, including SMEs, subject to warning letters from Disney’s lawyers. They join in on the hype by producing products depicting colored versions of Mickey Mouse and containing the word without realizing the potential for Copyright and Trademark violations.   Remember that Walt Disney is a big company in the IP business. They understand the ins and outs of Intellectual Property law. Apart from that, they also continue to update their IP-based characters and their source of income. That is the only way the validity period of Economic Rights in Copyright can continue to be extended. Steamboat Willy is only one of tens of thousands of works featuring IP-based characters, a source of income for the Walt Disney Company. Missing one will not affect its revenue, which since 2022 will be above USD 80 billion per year.   From Walt Disney, we learn that creating original characters, if managed well, will be more profitable and provide long-term benefits. Instead of making imitation works that take advantage of the momentary hype. The public will also see it as a cheap work or a parody of no quality.   Should you need further information about Public Domain, Copyright, or other Intellectual Property management, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected]. Sources:  Coming Soon Variety  

5-Common-Types-of-IP-Violation-in-Indonesian-E-Commerce-affa-global

5 Common Types of IP Violation in Indonesian E-Commerce

Intellectual Property

5 Common Types of IP Violation in Indonesian E-Commerce The presence of e-commerce has changed the shopping habits of Indonesians. Statista Market Insights data predicts that users by the end of this year will reach 196.47 million, or an increase of more than 22 million since 2022.  The Central Bank of the Republic of Indonesia also stated that the value of e-commerce transactions in 2022 will reach IDR 476.3 trillion. This number is predicted to continue to increase because active e-commerce users in Indonesia still account for only around 30% of transactions in cyberspace.   By now, opening an e-commerce site or app is the easiest way to compare the cheapest product we want. However, with all this convenience, you must still be aware of the potential for Intellectual Property violations in e-commerce. You need to remember that even though the platform organizers have tried to carry out sorting even with AI, it will only be helpful if you, who have self-screening capabilities, are easily tempted by the low prices of products that should be expensive.   Counterfeit goods are not the only potential for Intellectual Property (IP) violations in e-commerce; there are at least 5 (five) types of IP violations, which we can describe as follows:   1. Sale of Counterfeit Goods Even when selling fake goods, the method is more sophisticated, not blatantly using names or products with very different qualities. a. Photos taken from the official site; Suppose the seller is not an official store but uses an official photo. In that case, you should immediately be suspicious and use your right to ask for some actual photos of the product before making a transaction.   b. Preloved with invoice; If the seller uses pictures that show an invoice with the product, like pretending it was purchased from an official store, please don’t hesitate to ask for some photos of the actual product before making a transaction.   c. Normal price for a counterfeit product; If you are a collector of specific brands, you must know the shape, color, or placement of the official logo on the product. You may also know how many variants are produced for this season, including the look of the limited variants. So you won’t be deceived when you find a product with a different color, which shouldn’t be available in the market, even though it is the same price as the original product.   d. Using the word ORI or SUPER ORI or HIGH GRADE; The word “ori,” which means original, should only be used for authentic products. However, sellers of counterfeit goods have recently used this word to attract buyers. Moreover, if the inclusion of the word “ori” is coupled with the price of the item being much cheaper, you should be suspicious of its authenticity.   e. Cheap products directly from the factory. It would be best if you were also wary of this description when you find a cheaper good on e-commerce. Only official stores or distributors can do this if the product comes from Indonesia and gets wholesale price benefits. Another possibility is stolen goods that are not complete or of bad quality. Are you sure you still want to buy something like that?   2. Promoting Product Without Verification This type is the same as in the first category; the difference is that it involves the lure of a big discount, which results in the price being much lower than the market, but it is not sold by official stores or distributors (which in the same time are not providing the same promotions). Apart from the possibility that what is being sold is not a genuine product, it could also be that the product is smuggled without paying official import taxes, with questionable completeness and quality.   3. Selling Irresponsibly Through E-Commerce Sometimes, some health and beauty products are sold using a “direct selling” scheme, and sale activities via e-commerce are prohibited. Because their exclusive products are only sold through direct selling methods to downlines/registered members. So direct sales to the public (non-members) are a violation because they destroy the agreed business scheme and membership system.   4. SOPs for IP Violations in E-Commerce Are Not Yet Standardized Even though e-commerce has acted as an intermediary that will hold funds from buyers and return them if there is a problem with the goods, there are still loopholes that allow transactions to be completed even though the goods have a problem. For example, the buyer forgets to unbox with a video or only immediately checks the item’s authenticity after the deadline. If you are caught in this problem, the procedures of complaint from each e-commerce are not standardized. The absence of customer service that truly understands the situation makes this even more difficult. Especially if the customer service is entirely automated without involving humans.   5. Borderless E-Commerce Platform With the increasingly open cross-border international trade through e-commerce, you must understand the risks of purchasing goods outside Indonesia. If you find lower prices for goods, even though they are shipped from abroad, and you know that there is an official distributor in Indonesia, your vigilance needs to be increased even more. Because there could be an IP violation in the form of distribution without permission/violating the law/not paying import tax, which is not impossible, within the time frame of the order process, the police arrest the seller in the country of origin, and you will not get the goods you want.   All of the IP violation practices above harm you as a buyer and significantly impact the country. These losses include: Negative Reputation of Indonesian From the latest Priority Watch List (PWL) 2023 report, released by the United States Trade Representative (USTR), Indonesia, along with Argentina, Chile, India, Russia, China, and Venezuela, is still on the investment blocklist because it is prone to piracy practices. In particular, the Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy 2022 report, also released by USTR, lists several local e-commerce sites…

Demystifying-the-Public-Domain-Permissions-and-Limitations-affa-global

Demystifying the Public Domain: Permissions and Limitations

Intellectual Property1 Comment

Demystifying the Public Domain: Permissions and Limitations We can almost always see this iconic portrait of Bung Tomo‘s enthusiastic speech every November 10th, as Indonesia celebrates National Heroes’ Day. In fact, according to Tempo Magazine‘s journalistic investigation, this photo was not taken on that date but later in 1947 by Frans Mendur, when Bung Tomo chaired a meeting in Malang, East Java.   As a Work, this iconic portrait was first published in 1949, together with other historical photos of the Indonesian struggle, including photographs of the Proclamation, taken by Alex Mendur, Frans Mendur, and Abdoel Wahab Saleh, in a photo album “Revolutionary Paintings” courtesy of the Indonesia Press Photo Service (IPPHOS). The first two names are the brothers who founded IPPHOS. Because the portrait of Bung Tomo in Malang is more in line with the public’s imagination about the war spirit of November 10, rather than the actual conditions, where orations were only given in radio studios, this portrait is widely used to support Heroes’ Day.   However, a portrait is still a Work that has copyright protection. Articles 1 and 9 of the Indonesian Copyright Law specifically state that a portrait is a photographic Work with human objects, and only the Creator has Economic Rights to publish, reproduce in all forms, adapt, transform, and distribute a Work. If another party wants to use it, they must obtain permission from the Creator or Copyright Holder.   What if the Creator or Copyright Holder no longer exists? The Copyright Law regulates the validity period of Economic Rights, a reference for whether we still have to obtain permission from the Creator or Copyright Holder for a Work. If the validity period has passed, the Work has entered the Public Domain, and the public can use it freely without asking anyone for permission.   The Copyright Law in Indonesia divides the validity period of Economic Rights over Work into three different periods:   1. 25 years since the first publication; Applies to Works of Applied Art in the form of fine art created by using art to a product so that it has an aesthetic impression to meet practical needs, including images, motifs, or ornaments on a product.   2. 25 years since the first publication; This applies to the following three categories: Photographic works; portrait; cinematographic; video games; computer program; the appearance of written work; translations, interpretations, adaptations, anthologies, databases, adaptations, arrangements, modifications, and other works resulting from transformation; translation, adaption, arrangement, transformation or modification of traditional cultural expressions; compilation of works or data, either in a format that computer programs or other media can read; and the compilation of traditional cultural expressions as long as the compilation is an original work. Works Made for Hire; Anonymous Works and Pseudonymous Works.   3. During the life of the creator and 70 years after the creator’s death; Books, pamphlets, and all other written works; lectures, lectures, speeches, and other similar works; demonstration materials created for educational and scientific purposes; songs or music with or without text; drama, musical drama, dance, choreography, puppetry, and pantomime; works of fine art in all forms such as paintings, drawings, carvings, calligraphy, sculpture, statues or collages; architectural works; map; and batik artwork or other motif art.   4. Limitless Time Applies to held Traditional Cultural Expressions by government, which includes the following six categories: a. textual verbal, both spoken and written, in the form of prose or poetry, in various themes and message content, which can be in the form of literary works or informative narratives; b. music, including, among other things, vocal, instrumental, or a combination thereof; c. movement, including, among other things, dance; d. theater, including, among other things, puppet shows and folk plays; e. fine arts, both in two-dimensional and three-dimensional form, made from various materials such as leather, wood, bamboo, metal, stone, ceramics, paper, textiles, etc., or a combination thereof; and f. traditional ceremonies.   From the four categories above, it can be concluded that all works, if not included in Traditional Cultural Expressions, will ultimately fall into the Public Domain. Therefore, the portrait of Bung Tomo, first published in 1949, has been in the Public Domain since 1999.   In addition, there are regulations in Article 43 (e) of the Copyright Law regarding Copyright Restrictions, which states that duplication, announcement, and/or distribution of portraits of the President, Vice President, Former President, Former Vice President, National Heroes, heads of state institutions, leaders ministries/non-ministerial government agencies, and/or regional authorities with due regard for dignity and fairness by the provisions of laws and regulations are not considered a Copyright Infringement. Since 2008, Bung Tomo has been designated as a National Hero, so the public’s use of this iconic portrait is not Copyright infringement.   However, it would be best to remember that the legal basis governing Copyright varies in each country. So, the rules that apply in Indonesia may be different from other countries.   Comparison of Public Domains Abroad Duration of Copyright in the United States The Copyright Law in the United States divides the duration of Copyright as follows:      1. During the life of the creator and 70 years after the creator’s death; The creator’s identity is known for all works created after January 1, 1978.      2. 95 years from the year of its first publication, or a term of 120 years from the year of its creation, whichever expires first; For Anonymous Works, Pseudonymous Works, and Works Made for Hire      3. 45 years after the creation; Works created before January 1, 1978, but expired before December 31, 2002; and, if the work is published on or before December 31, 2002      4. 28 years after the publication. Any Posthumous Work or of any periodical, cyclopedic, or other composite work upon which the copyright was originally secured by the proprietor thereof, or any Work copyrighted by a corporate body (otherwise than as assignee or licensee of the individual author) or by an employer for whom…

The-Impact-Of-Intellectual-Property-On-The-Quality-Of-Life-For-People-With-Disabilities-affa-global

The Impact of Intellectual Property on the Quality of Life for People with Disabilities

Intellectual Property

The Impact of Intellectual Property on the Quality of Life for People with Disabilities   The 2022* Asian Para Games, which ended yesterday in Hangzhou, China, showcased human civilization’s sportsmanship, high fighting spirit, and demonstrated the impact of Intellectual Property (IP) on the quality of life of people with disabilities in many ways. For example, the Games featured a wide range of patented assistive technologies used by athletes with disabilities to compete at the highest level. These patented assistive technologies included:   Running Prosthetics:  Losing a leg (or both) is not an obstacle for paralympic athletes to run; they no longer use prosthetic legs in the form of legs but unique legs in the form of carbon fiber plates, which are lighter and enable them to run like Olympic athletes. One of the Running Prosthetic manufacturers whose products are widely used is Ottobock, which currently has more than 1,800 patents.   Racing Wheelchairs: There are three sports where wheelchair use is permitted at the 2022 Asian Para Games: basketball, fencing, and tennis. Of course, they don’t compete with ordinary wheelchairs, but wheelchairs with innovative technology that makes them lighter but more robust, which allows them to act more quickly and safely.   Swim Fins: Swimming athletes who don’t have legs can use artificial fins made from silicon worn on their hands to swim faster and more efficiently.   Blindfolds: Because not all Paralympic athletes are entirely blind, for the competition to be fair, they are required to use unique cloth coverings, for example, when competing in athletics. These blindfolds are also made with an innovative design to be worn comfortably throughout the competition.   At the 2022 Asian Para Games, Indonesia achieved the highest achievement by reaching 6th place, under China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and India. The economic benefits obtained certainly do not only come to people with disabilities. The sporting event, which took place from October 22nd to 28th, 2023, generated billions of dollars in economic activity and created thousands of jobs from its implementation and innovative products protected by Intellectual Property.   Intellectual Property continues to play an essential role in improving the quality of life of people with disabilities in various ways, including: Encourage innovation in assistive technologies to help people with disabilities live more independent and fulfilling lives. For example, IP rights have been instrumental in developing technologies such as screen readers, speech-to-text software, and prosthetic limbs. Make assistive technologies more affordable and accessible to people with disabilities. For example, IP rights can establish licensing agreements allowing manufacturers to produce and sell assistive technologies at lower prices. Promote the inclusion of people with disabilities in the workplace and society. For example, IP rights can be used to protect the intellectual property of businesses that employ people with disabilities. This can help to create jobs for people with disabilities and reduce the stigma associated with disability.   Overall, the 2022 Asian Para Games were a powerful reminder of the positive impact that IP can have on the quality of life for people with disabilities. IP-protected assistive technologies can help people with disabilities live more independent and fulfilling lives, participate in the workplace and society, and achieve their full potential.    If you need more information about IP protection in Indonesia or abroad, please feel free to contact us via email at [email protected] Source: WIPO Magazines 2022 Asian Para Games   *) Dated 2022, as it originally marked the event scheduled for 2022, which was subsequently rescheduled to 2023 due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The-Intellectual-Property-Landscape-of-Tokusatsu-A-Comprehensive-Overview-affa

The Intellectual Property Landscape of Tokusatsu: A Comprehensive Overview

Intellectual Property

The Intellectual Property Landscape of Tokusatsu: A Comprehensive Overview Tokusatsu (特撮) is a Japanese term for live-action (non-anime) films or television programs that heavily use practical special effects. However, in its development, this genre in Japan is mainly used in movies or series with superhero themes. From giant monsters (Kaiju) such as Godzilla and Gamera, humans who turn into giant Ultraman, masked heroes riding a bike (Kamen Rider), colorful Super Sentai heroes, metallic heroes like Gavan, and many more.   In Japan, Tokusatsu has become an enormous industry. Every year, there are at least 3 (three) new series, 2 (films) on the big screen, and dozens of OTT content, with some toys that consistently record best-selling toy sales. The BANDAI toy company, as the Master Licensee of Kamen Rider, Ultraman, and Super Sentai, records revenues of around 60 billion Yen per year from the above Intellectual Properties. Of course, this is apart from the income from broadcasting rights received by Production Houses from broadcasting throughout the world.   Then, what other Intellectual Properties are related to Tokusatsu? Here is the explanation:   1.      Copyright Copyright is Intellectual Property in science, art, and literature resulting from inspiration, ability, thoughts, imagination, dexterity, skills, or expertise expressed in real form. According to the Copyright Law, the work is called Creation, and the creator is for sure called the Creator. Because one individual does not make Tokusatsu but is a joint work of several companies, the Creator can be the designer or production leader with the title of Producer, but these companies own the Copyright Holder. For example, the late Shotaro Ishinomori is recognized as the creator of the Kamen Rider series. Still, the Copyright Holder is listed as jointly owned by Ishimori Pro (Shotaro’s company), TV Asahi (the broadcasting TV station), and TOEI (the production house). Companies registered as Copyright Holders can also be seen from writing such as “(C) 2023 石森プロ・テレビ朝日・東映” in various published materials. Tokusatsu’s works related to Copyright are not only the series or films but also the songs, scripts, characterizations, illustrations, and books related to them. Copyright is protected as long as the creator is alive, plus 70 years after that, and cannot be extended. Protected here means that only the Copyright Holder has Economic Rights and Moral Rights, so that no other party may publish, duplicate, translate, adapt/arrange/transform, distribute, announce, communicate, or rent it without the permission of the Copyright Holder.   2.      Trademark Trademark in Tokusatsu is not the additional protection but the primary Intellectual Property, which makes the name unique, along with the logo, which makes it different from other works already on the market. In contrast to Copyright, which does not need to be registered, Trademarks must be registered to obtain protection. When applying for a Trademark, it is necessary to provide information about the appropriate protection classes according to its products and/or services. The number of classes registered for the Tokusatsu series, which airs throughout the year, usually reaches 22 classes, but for films, it is only around 6 (six) to a dozen. This significant difference in numbers is because broadcasts present throughout the year will also have more derivative products and services that can be produced, and all of them must be protected from the possibility of being exploited by other irresponsible parties. Some of the trademark classes that are usually registered for the Tokusatsu series that air throughout the year are classes 32 (beverages), 30 (processed food), 28 (toys), 25 (clothing), 16 (paper), and 9 (electronic equipment). Uniquely, the Trademark Registration process is open from the start of the application process, which can be accessed by the public via the Japanese Patent Information site, providing a means for fans to get a sneak peek at the name of the new Tokusatsu series, several months before the official announcement.   3.      Industrial Design In the world of Tokusatsu, there is a unique symbiotic mutualistic relationship between toy manufacturers and Copyright Holders. It is so unique that it is common knowledge that the Tokusatsu series is called a toy advertisement that airs throughout the year. As a toy manufacturer and shareholder of the Tokusatsu producers, BANDAI also provides other support, namely making character designs, so that they can be immediately ready to be produced in various kinds of toys liked by fans of various ages from abroad. The Industrial Designs for Tokusatsu toys registered by BANDAI can also be seen on the Japanese Patent Information site. Uniquely, even though the Industrial Design is registered and owned by BANDAI, all names involved in the creative process, including representatives from the production house, are still registered as the Designer. Registration of Industrial Designs for these toys is essential so that no other party makes imitation products. Because the practice of pirating Tokusatsu toys is usually done by producing the same toys but with different Trademarks. So by registering, even if these pirates escape the trap of Trademark violations, they will not escape Industrial Design violations.   4.      Patent Patents are one type of Intellectual Property that needs to be understood in Indonesia. It is as if the patent is Intellectual Property, even though it is only one type. Patents are Intellectual Property directly related to innovation and technology with novelty value. If associated with Tokusatsu, the patent protection could be in the thin but strong action figure joint technology, toy sensors that can be activated by finger movements or inserting a coded card, and BANDAI owns all the patents.   5.      Trade Secret The formula used to make a hero’s costume that is strong but light, to the right amount of chemicals to cause a significant but safe explosion, as well as other secret formulas, can be kept as Trade Secrets. These secrets make Tokusatsu a spectacle that continues to amaze fans, and all team members involved are bound by a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).   6.      License Agreement After having a recorded Copyright…

Racing-Ahead-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-IP-in-MotoGP-affa-global

Racing Ahead: A Comprehensive Guide to IP in MotoGP

Intellectual Property1 Comment

Racing Ahead: A Comprehensive Guide to IP in MotoGP   The 2023 Mandalika MotoGP in Indonesia on October 15 again brought Ducati racer Francesco Bagnaia to the top of the standings with 346 points. The event, officially called “Pertamina Grand Prix of Indonesia 2023”, is the 15th race of the 20 MotoGP World Championship series, which is in a year generating a turnover of around 500 million Euros or about 8.3 trillion Rupiah.   Dorna Sports S.L., a company from Spain that has held MotoGP Commercial Rights from the Fédération Internationale de Motocyclisme (FIM) since 1992. In Dorna’s hands, the fastest motorbike racing event on land has become the most expensive in the world with its Intellectual Property business. In 2021, Dorna Sports successfully recorded 137 million Euros just from selling Broadcast Rights to various TV and streaming platforms to broadcast each competition live. Income from Broadcasting Rights is said to reach 66% of the total income from all Intellectual Property (IP) businesses carried out. So, what other IPs are related to the implementation of MotoGP?   Trademark The first is, of course, MotoGP’s unique naming and logo. Dorna has registered MotoGP in 22 existing Trademark classes, whose protection extends to 53 countries worldwide. Of the 22 Trademark classes, it includes class 25 (clothing, shoes, hats), 28 (toys), and 30 (tea & coffee), apart from, of course, class 41 (sports activities), which is the core of its business. In Indonesia, the “MotoGP” Trademark is still protected until 2027 and can be extended every ten years.   Apart from that, Dorna also registered Trademarks for various derivative businesses related to MotoGP, such as MotoGP Kids, MotoGP VIP Village, and MotoGP Legends. By registering all the Trademarks, Dorna has become the owner of the Exclusive Rights to MotoGP and prevents the possibility of other parties registering identical or similar names in the future.   Copyright Race materials, images, promotions, and other content related to MotoGP are included in the Copyright category. As the holder of Commercial Rights to MotoGP, Dorna also owns the Copyright to MotoGP. Thus, it has the right to regulate and control the use of all Copyrights related to MotoGP, including Broadcast Rights, to broadcast the race live on various platforms worldwide. The granting of Broadcasting Rights licenses is the most significant income for Dorna. It has been recorded that from 2015 to 2021, except for 2020, there has always been an increase in revenue from Broadcasting Rights. It started from 105, 115, 125, 135, 130, and 137 million Euros (around 2.3 trillion Rupiah) in 2021. For the 2023 MotoGP World Championship, there are more than 90 channels that are official broadcasters, representing 63 countries in the world. In Indonesia, MotoGP broadcast rights are held by Trans7, MNC Vision, KVision, UseeTV, and Maxstream-SpoTV.   Patent A large-scale sports competition, especially one related to the automotive industry, indeed cannot be separated from technological inventions, whether closely related to engine construction and speed or safety equipment, which are objects that can be patented. MotoGP has also become a place for innovation competition between motorbike manufacturers and safety equipment to get maximum exposure before the technology is applied to commercial products sold to the public.   Industrial Design Suppose the design of a motorbike, riding equipment, safety equipment, and other racing equipment does not contain elements of inventions but still has an aesthetic novelty design. In that case, it can be registered and receive Industrial Design protection. The most straightforward example is the commercialization of helmets used by MotoGP racers.   Trade Secret Specific racing strategies are Trade Secrets, including technical details and other confidential information. These secrets give MotoGP teams a competitive advantage by not disclosing certain important information to competitors, and all team members involved are bound by a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).   Domain Name Domain names related to MotoGP are significant for maintaining online presence and marketing. Dorna has registered “motogp.com” to prevent cybersquatting and brand misuse. This domain is also available in many languages, including Indonesian, to facilitate the marketing and disseminating of official information to all media and MotoGP fans worldwide.   Licensing Agreement Apart from the Copyright previously mentioned, the License Agreement can also cover other Intellectual Property regimes, such as Brand Licenses to produce and sell merchandise, mobile phone applications, video games, and many more. Because if we talk about business, a robust Intellectual Property License Agreement can mutually benefit all parties involved.   From Dorna Sports’ financial report in 2021, more than 100 million Euros were spent on organizing MotoGP. However, they managed to record a profit of 46 million from revenue of 207 million Euros. This figure is undoubtedly quite fantastic for sporting activities supported by solid IPs.   Because a successful sports business is also an Intellectual Property business, would you be serious about getting into it? In that case, you can start on the most miniature scale, from events that are local but have the potential for a broad audience, and continue to present exciting and competitive matches so that more and more parties are interested in joining in getting a license.   If you need further information about Licensing Agreements, Trademark registration, Patent protection, or anything related to Intellectual Property, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].