Trademark Filing and Renewal Fees in the US Rise Starting January 2025: What You Need to Know - AFFA IPR

Trademark Filing & Renewal Fees in the U.S. Rise Starting January 2025: What You Need to Know

Intellectual Property, Trademark

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced fee adjustments for Trademark filing and renewal, which will take effect on January 18, 2025. These changes include increases in fees for various Trademark-related services, ranging from USD 50 to 150.   If you own a registered Trademark in the United States or plan to file a Trademark there, here are the details of the fee changes:   Application Fees Current New TEAS Standard* USD 350 n/a TEAS Plus** USD 250 n/a Base application (sections 1 and 44), per class n/a USD 350 Application fee filed with WIPO (section 66(a)), per class USD 500 USD 600 Subsequent designation fee filed with WIPO (section 66(a)), per class                                USD 500 USD 600   Surcharge Fees Current New Insufficient information (sections 1 and 44), per class n/a USD 100 Using the free-form text box instead of the Trademark ID Manual within the Trademark Center to identify goods and services (sections 1 and 44), per class n/a USD 200 Each additional group of 1,000 characters in the free-form text box beyond the first 1,000 (sections 1 and 44), per affected class n/a USD 200   Post-Registration Maintenance Fees Current New Section 9 registration renewal application, per class                                                            USD 300 USD 325 Section 8 declaration, per class USD 225 USD 325 Section 15 declaration, per class USD 200 USD 250 Section 71 declaration, per class USD 225 USD 325 Renewal fee filed at WIPO USD 300 USD 325   Petitions and Letters of Protest Fees Current New Petition to the Director USD 250 USD 400 Petition to revive an application                                                                                           USD 150 USD 250 Letter of protest USD 50 USD 150   Intent-to-Use Fees Current New Amendment to allege use (AAU), per class                                                                            USD 100 USD 150 Statement of use (SOU), per class USD 100 USD 150   If possible, you can file a new Trademark application before January 2025 and take advantage of the services of an experienced Trademark Consultant to calculate all potential costs that may arise afterward. By understanding these costs, you can better prepare in advance, ensuring a smooth trademark protection process in the United States.   Make sure not to miss business opportunities and always secure Trademark protection in the United States by registering your Trademark there.   Should you need more information regarding Trademark registration and protection in the United States, please contact us via email: [email protected].   *) Trademark Electronic Application System Standard: A registration scheme with higher fees, suitable for unique goods and/or services with specific descriptions if they are not available in the existing list provided by the USPTO. **) Trademark Electronic Application System Plus: A standard registration scheme that requires applicants to use the list of goods/services already provided by the USPTO.

WIPO's 2024 Report: Indonesia Ranks Among Global Leaders in Trademarks and Design Growth - AFFA IPR

WIPO’s 2024 Report: Indonesia Ranks Among Global Leaders in Trademarks and Design Growth

Intellectual Property

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) recently released the World Intellectual Property Indicators 2024 (WIPI) report, highlighting the growth performance of Intellectual Property (IP) in 2023. This report provides a comprehensive overview of global trends in IP, covering Patents, Trademarks, Geographical Indications, Industrial Designs, and Plant Variety Protection. It is a vital reference for governments, entrepreneurs, and innovators to understand their country’s position in the global IP landscape.   China, India, Russia, and Indonesia showcased remarkable growth in this report. China leads with 1.64 million Patent applications, accounting for 46% of all Patent applications worldwide. Regarding Trademark and industrial design applications, China also dominated with 7.4 million Trademark applications (approximately 49% of the total global market) and 58% of global industrial design filings. Similarly, China commanded a 54% share in plant variety protection applications.   How Did Indonesia Perform?   While the global average for Trademark applications declined by 2%, Indonesia bucked the trend with a 10% increase in 2023, trailing only Russia (30%) and Mexico (11%). For industrial designs, Indonesia recorded the highest global growth at 37.3%, far surpassing the global average of 2.8%. In absolute numbers, Trademark applications in Indonesia rose from 122,458 to 152,447, and industrial design filings increased from 4,795 to 6,326. These achievements place Indonesia as a Southeast Asian leader, far ahead of Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand.   Global Rankings: Where Does Indonesia Stand?   Trademark Applications Indonesia ranks 15th globally, behind: China (7,184,831) United States (739,395) Russia (546,455) India (520,862) EUIPO (436,720) Brazil (427,327) Turkey (398,763) United Kingdom (345,205) Japan (328,559) Iran (327,384) South Korea (314,284) France (263,550) Germany (229,793) Mexico (205,867)   Industrial Design Applications Indonesia ranks 19th globally, trailing: China (826,086) EUIPO (116,884) United Kingdom (81,543) United States (60,022) South Korea (59,454) Turkey (58,084) Italy (37,099) Japan (32,061) France (30,023) Germany (29,663) India (28,168) Spain (14,776) Switzerland (11,391) Russia (10,472) Canada (9,037) Australia (8,798) Iran (7,841) Brazil (7,679)   Creative Industries Drive Growth According to the WIPI 2024 report, Indonesia’s growth in Trademarks is largely fueled by MSMEs and the creative economy, while the textile, fashion, and handicraft sectors primarily drive the surge in industrial design filings The data further indicates that the primary purpose of registering Trademarks and industrial designs in Indonesia is to facilitate exports.   Future Potential and Opportunities As public awareness of IP registration continues to grow, Indonesia holds immense potential to become a hub for innovation and intellectual property in the ASEAN region. Strengthening regulations, increasing public education, and fostering collaboration with the private sector can help capitalize on this momentum.   Should you need more information about the registration and protection of Patents, Trademarks, or Industrial Designs, both domestically and internationally, please contact us via email: [email protected].

The Ultimate Guide to the Amendment of the Indonesian Patent Law - AFFA IPR

The Ultimate Guide to the Amendment of the Indonesian Patent Law

Patent, Intellectual Property6 Comments

The Indonesian IP world has just gotten more exciting after the enactment of the Law No. 65 Year 2024 on the Third Amendment to the Law No. 13 Year 2016 on Patents on 28 October 2024. The amendment is designed to be in line with the current technological practices around the world, while at the same time putting a special emphasis on the national interest. It also aims to make Indonesia’s Patent System more adaptable and responsive to contemporary needs.   Please note that as the result of this amendment, several official fees have increased as well. The actions that are subject to the increase include the acceleration of publication, substantive examination request for both invention patent and simple patent, and the appeal before the patent board of appeal/appeal commission. Whereas for recordals (data amendment,  assignment and license), certificate correction, filing and annuity fees remain the same.   The key theme of the amendment is divided into 28 parts below.  Please note that the amendment has the following conditions:   Patent applications that have been submitted and processed but are not yet completed will continue to be processed based on the provisions of patent legislation prior to the enactment of this Law. The protection period for simple patent applications submitted under Law No. 14 of 2001 on Patents and Law No. 13 of 2016 on Patents, as amended by Law No. 6 of 2023 on the Establishment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 2 of 2022 on Job Creation as Law, is calculated from the Filing Date. Patents granted under Law No. 14 of 2001 on Patents shall remain valid until the end of their protection period.   Should you need more information regarding the proposed amendment of Patent Law in Indonesia, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].  

Unraveling the Global Complexity of IP Crime: Money Laundering and More! AFFA IPR

Unraveling the Global Complexity of IP Crime: Money Laundering and More!

Patent, Intellectual Property, Trademark, Copyright, Industrial Design1 Comment

Intellectual Property (IP) Crime negatively impacts the economy and consumer safety and has become structurally more complex, posing a worldwide threat to economic and social security.   According to the recently released report “Uncovering the Ecosystem of Intellectual Property Crime,” published this October by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), it is revealed that 6% of imported products entering the European Union are counterfeit, with a value exceeding 2 billion euros) annually. This figure represents only the seized products, mainly packaging materials, toys, cigarettes, and CDs/DVDs. Imagine if we could account for the undetected counterfeit goods distributed worldwide.   So, why is tackling IP crime so challenging? The report highlights that this form of crime is highly networked and involves corrupt officials, money laundering, and even tax officers. EUIPO labels these facilitators as IP Crime Enablers!   How significant is their role, and how do they perpetuate Intellectual Property crime? Here are the details.   Intellectual Property Crime – The Definition   In the document, “IP Crime” refers to illegal activities involving the theft, infringement, or unauthorized use of Intellectual Property (IP) rights, which include Copyrights, Industrial Designs, Trademarks, Patents, Geographical Indications, and Trade Secrets. The document categorizes IP crime primarily as:   Counterfeiting Manufacturing, importing, distributing, storing, or selling goods that bear the Trademark of a genuine brand without permission. Examples: Counterfeit Pharmaceuticals: Production and distribution of fake pharmaceutical products that can pose severe health risks to consumers. For instance, counterfeit Semaglutide injection pens falsely labeled as containing the active ingredient were found to contain other substances, leading to serious health incidents​. Counterfeit Automotive Parts: The production and distribution of fake automotive parts, like brake pads and wheel rims, infringe Trademarks and pose serious safety risks. Piracy Unauthorized copying, use, reproduction, and distribution of materials protected by IP rights, such as digital media, software, and entertainment. Example: Digital Piracy: Illicit streaming services that distribute copyrighted content (like movies and sports events) without authorization. In one case, a streaming service was operating across multiple countries, generating significant revenue through illegal broadcasts​.   The Mechanics of IP Crime   IP criminals exploit weaknesses in the global supply chain, legal loopholes, and infrastructure to operate with resilience and evade law enforcement efforts. This structured approach allows them to profit significantly while remaining difficult to prosecute due to their operations’ multi-jurisdictional and often hidden nature. The structured process criminal networks use to conduct IP crimes ranges from obtaining infringing items to laundering the proceeds. Here are the key phases:   Infringing IP Rights (Acquisition Phase) This is the initial stage where IP rights are intentionally violated. Criminals produce counterfeit goods by replicating brand logos, labels, or pirated content. This phase may involve either manufacturing counterfeit products directly or diverting legitimate products from the supply chain. Common sources for counterfeit goods include China, Hong Kong, and Türkiye. Transportation and Distribution Phase After acquiring the counterfeit items, networks transport them globally, often abusing the legal logistical and shipping sectors to move goods across borders. Criminals use sophisticated smuggling techniques, including splitting shipments and hiding counterfeit items within legitimate products to avoid detection. Marketing and Retail Phase Criminals use both online and offline methods to market and sell counterfeit products. Online marketplaces, social media platforms, and even the dark web provide anonymity and access to large audiences. Offline, counterfeit goods may also be sold through physical retail outlets or open markets. Dealing with Profits and Risks (Money-Laundering Phase) The final stage involves managing the profits from these illegal sales. Criminal networks employ money laundering techniques to disguise the origins of their profits. This includes investing in legal businesses, conducting physical cash transfers, or using complex digital financial systems to reintegrate funds into the economy.   Parties Also Involved in Intellectual Property Crimes In addition to the 4 (four) phases of crime above, Europol and EUIPO mapped the parties involved in IP crimes, making these crimes complex and challenging to eradicate.   Criminal Enablers These are illegal activities or crimes that help facilitate IP crime: Corruption: Bribery or manipulation within organizations to ease illegal processes. Forced Labour: Exploitation of labor, often under inhumane conditions, to produce counterfeit goods. Cybercrime: Digital crimes that support IP crime, such as phishing, malware, or data theft. Money Laundering: Concealing the profits from IP crime by converting illegal earnings into legitimate assets. Document Fraud: Creating fake documents to disguise the origin or legitimacy of counterfeit goods. Environmental Crime (Envicrime): Illegal activities that harm the environment, often associated with the improper disposal of waste from counterfeit production. Non-Criminal Enablers These are lawful activities or structures that criminals misuse to facilitate IP crime: Professional Expertise: Use of skills from professionals (e.g., lawyers, technicians) to support illegal IP activities. Use of Legal Business Structures (LBS): Legal businesses that provide a front for illegal IP activities, such as follows: Trading Companies or Factories These legitimate businesses can be set up or inserted into the supply chain to disguise the production or distribution of counterfeit goods. Factories or production sites can be used to produce counterfeit goods under the guise of legitimate products. Warehouses or Logistics Service Providers Legitimate warehouses or logistics companies can be used to store or transport counterfeit goods without raising suspicion. For example, counterfeit goods can be hidden among legitimate products in international shipments. Physical Retail Stores Appearing legitimate stores can be used to sell counterfeit goods to consumers without their knowledge. Counterfeit goods can be sold alongside legitimate products, making it difficult for consumers to tell the difference. Online Stores or Marketplace Platforms Many IP criminals use e-commerce websites or accounts on platforms like Amazon, eBay, or social media to sell counterfeit products. These platforms often give the impression of a legitimate business, making it easier for criminals to reach consumers at a wide range. Front or Shell Companies These companies are technically legitimate but serve only as a front for illegal activity. They are often used to launder money…

An Analysis of Trademark Law in Indonesia - AFFA IPR

An Analysis of Trademark Law in Indonesia

Trademark

In Indonesia, the primary law on trademarks is Law No. 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications, known as the Trademark Law. The Trademark Law was updated through Law No. 6, 2023 on the Enactment of a Replacement Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 2, 2022 on Job Creation as Law. Furthermore, there are several bylaws that regulate more specific matters, including:   Government Regulation No. 28, 2019 concerning Types and Tariffs of Non-Tax State Revenues Applicable to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, which sets the official fees for various actions that can be filed before the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) under the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Government Regulation No. 22, 2018 on the International Registration of Marks Under the Protocols Relevant to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks, which covers all aspects of international registration filed in or from Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 90, 2019 concerning the Trademark Appeal Commission, established in 1995, concerning procedures for application, examination and settlement of appeals at the commission. The Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 12, 2021 on the Amendment to Regulation No. 67, 2016 concerning the Trademark Registration Decree of the Director General of Intellectual Property in the Field of Trademarks. The ministerial regulation covers registration, classes of goods and services, and the rectification of issued certificates and records. The Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 10, 2022 on the Amendment to Regulation of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 12, 2019 on Geographical Indications.   Scope of Trademarks   The Trademark Law holds a mark to be any sign capable of being represented graphically in the form of drawings, logos, names, words, letters, numerals, colour arrangements, in two and/or three-dimensional shapes, sounds, holograms, or a combination of two or more of these elements to distinguish goods and/or services produced by a person or legal entity in trading goods and/or services.   It acknowledges two types of Trademarks: traditional and non-traditional marks. Some marks cannot be registered due to their lack of inherent distinctiveness. These conditions are met if marks:   Are contrary to the state ideology, laws and regulations, religious morality, ethics, or public order; Are identical to, related to, or simply describe the goods and/or services for which registration is sought; Contain elements that could mislead the public about the origin, quality, type, size, variety or purpose of the goods and/or services for which registration is sought, or are the names of protected plant varieties for similar goods and/or services; Contain information that is not consistent with the quality, benefits, or efficacy of the goods and/or services produced; Lack distinctive character; Are common names and/or symbols belonging to the public; or Contain functional forms.   Applying   The Trademark Law adopts a first-to-file principle. In general, any individual, organisation or company can file for Trademark registration. However, the law also regulates Trademark registrations that are filed in bad faith. Article 21 of the Trademark Law stipulates that an application is refused if it is submitted by an applicant in bad faith.   In practice, it is quite challenging to determine whether an application is filed in bad faith or not.   A bad-faith application that later matures to registration can always be invalidated at the Court of Commerce, as regulated under article 77 of the Trademark Law. This article stipulates that: “The lawsuit for invalidation may be filed in unlimited time if there is bad faith and/or the relevant mark contravenes the state ideology, laws and regulations, morality, religions, decency and public order”.   Filing    A Trademark search is strongly suggested for anyone who wishes to file a Trademark application in Indonesia. The search report will identify potential hazards and stumbling blocks to an otherwise successful registration process.   Assuming the search report gives an all-clear sign to further the application process, the applicant will then need to supply the following:   Name of applicant; Address; List of goods and services; and Representation of the mark to be filed, which can be in the form of woodmark, logo or non-traditional marks. Once the information has been provided, the patent lawyer will prepare two documents to be signed by the client: a power of attorney, and a statement of mark ownership.   Since 2019, e-filing is the only acceptable method of filing in Indonesia.   Timeline   Assuming the application does not receive any opposition and provisional refusal, then it may take 10-13 months from filing to obtaining a registration number. This estimate is significantly faster than it used to be, when even a straightforward registration would take two to three years.   Opposing    Applications are published for two months only. During the publication period, any interested party may file for opposition. Their opposition will be considered during the substantive examination stage.   Once the publication period has lapsed, there are no other formal means of filing for opposition, including extension requests.   To successfully oppose an application, it is strongly recommended that the opposer has a valid legal standing – namely, an earlier Trademark application or registration in Indonesia. Otherwise, it is likely that the examiner will reject the opposition by citing the first-to-file principle.   Invalidations and cancellations initiated by any third party, which must be filed at the court of commerce, are only feasible once the target Trademark has been registered.   Foreign Name    A Trademark can only be protected if it is registered in Indonesia, regardless of its fame. However, the Trademark Law has a mechanism to somewhat protect famous foreign Trademarks from bad-faith registrations by other parties.   Should another party try to maliciously file an application for a Trademark that is identical or similar to a famous foreign Trademark, the application will be rejected on the basis of article 21 of the Trademark Law, which stipulates: “An application is refused if the mark is substantively similar to or identical with a well-known…

AFFA Represents Trek Bicycle to Win a Trademark Non-Use Cancellation Action in Indonesia

AFFA Represents Trek Bicycle to Win a Trademark Non-Use Cancellation Action in Indonesia

Event, Trademark2 Comments

Since mid-2023, AFFA has been entrusted with handling disputes over the Marlin, Trademark owned by Trek Bicycle Corporation, headquartered in Waterloo, United States. Marlin is Trek’s Trademark for its flagship mountain bike frame.    In its home country, Marlin has been used since 1994 and was registered in 1998 at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, when it was submitted for registration in 2021 via the Madrid Protocol addressed to Indonesia, this Mark was rejected by the Directorate General Intellectual Property (DGIP) as the Trademark Office in Indonesia because it was deemed to have similarities in its essence or its entirety with the registered identical Prior Mark owned by PT Astra Honda Motor since November 2006, and the protection period would have ended in November 2026.   Based on research conducted by independent investigators, it turned out that PT Astra Honda Motor had never used this Trademark for 3 (three) consecutive years from the date of registration or from the date of last use. Due to this fact, a petition to cancel the Marlin Trademark due to non-use was filed as regulated in Article 74 paragraph (1) of the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law (Trademark Law).   Despite an unfavorable decision at the Court of Commerce level, the team at AFFA filed a cassation to the Supreme Court on December 6 and submitted a cassation memo on December 19, 2023. It was finally decided in a deliberation meeting of the Panel of Judges on Tuesday, March 19, 2024, that the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court had misapplied the law and ordered the DGIP to remove the Marlin Trademark under the name of PT Astra Honda Motor.   The most important factor is that the Trademark has not been used in the last 3 (three) years based on the non-use investigation report submitted to the Court of Commerce. Apart from that, the similarity in essence or its entirety, an element of Trademark cancellation, does not need to be explained in the petition. Moreover, it is supported by the fact that the Cassation Respondent/Defendant never appeared at the hearings, even though they had been summoned 3 (three) times. Another helpful point that enhanced the chance of obtaining a favorable decision is the fact that Trek Bicycle Corporation also has registrations for the same Mark in various countries, such as Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Panama, Honduras and others.    Contrary to the popular belief that non-use cancellations in Indonesia are impossible, this decision by the Supreme Court is a proof that non-use cancellations are possible, provided that the plaintiff comes prepared with non-use investigation report and ample additional evidence which suggest legitimate interests in the same Mark. Should you need more information about registering your Trademark in Indonesia or abroad, do not hesitate to email us at [email protected].

AI-A-Threat-to-Our-Intellectual-Property

AI: A Threat to Our Intellectual Property?

Patent, Intellectual Property, Copyright

AI: A Threat to Our Intellectual Property? AI is a branch of computer science that deals with creating intelligent agents, which are systems that can reason, learn, and act autonomously. AI research has been highly successful in developing effective techniques for solving a wide range of problems, from self-driving cars, medical diagnosis, product recommendations, creating articles or songs based on voice collections, and processing very realistic images.   The sophistication of AI also makes the operation of an application no longer need to be done manually. For example, not by carrying out a series of actions or commands via menu clicks but simply by writing down the command, the AI will carry out the operation automatically. However, this sophistication is open to controversy because the basis of AI’s capabilities comes from a collection of data taken without permission from what is already available on the internet. This is undoubtedly dangerous for Intellectual Property.   In general, AI can harm Intellectual Property in the following 3 (three) ways:   1. AI Can Copy Your Work AI can be trained on a massive dataset of text, images, and code. This means that it can learn to reproduce your work, even if you have taken steps to protect it, such as copyrighting it.   2. AI Can Create Derivative Works AI can be used to create new works based on your original work. For example, an AI could be used to create a new painting based on your existing painting.   3. AI Can Use Your Work Without Attribution AI can be used to create new works that do not give you credit for your original work. This can happen if the AI is not properly trained or if the person using the AI does not understand the importance of attribution.   Recognizing the potential for Intellectual Property infringement that AI-based applications can carry, several countries have taken steps to prevent further disputes. Some of these countries are Japan and the European Union.   AI Copyright Protection for Japanese Artists Agency for Cultural Affairs Government of Japan) on May 30th, the statement “Regarding the relationship between AI and copyright” divides AI use into two stages: First Stage AI can be used for research and education purposes without requiring Copyright permission, but this has limitations if it exceeds recognized necessary limits or harms the Copyright holder’s interests.  Second Stage If AI-generated works are published or sold as reproductions and infringe Copyright laws, the Copyright holder has the right to take legal action, potentially leading to criminal penalties.   The document emphasizes strict penalties for Copyright Infringement through AI-generated works that are almost identical or clearly dependent on existing copyrighted works. Japan plans to raise awareness about these issues through seminars and collaborate with legal experts to proactively regulate commercial AI and protect the copyrighted works of Japanese artists and creators.   This approach signifies Japan’s commitment to shield copyrighted creative work, data, and materials from commercial AI use, potentially impacting AI developers and users aiming to exploit stolen art and creative works for profit. The move marks a potential turning point in the fight against Copyright Infringement by AI, providing more vital protection for artists’ Intellectual Property.   In the next article, we will discuss The Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) the European Union’s draft for AI regulation related to the protection of Intellectual Property.   If you need further information regarding the registration and protection of Intellectual Property in Indonesia and abroad, don’t hesitate to contact us via [email protected]. Sources: IBM PC Watch  

Unveiling-Copyright-Ownership-in-the-Film-Industry-Legal-Perspectives-affa-global

Unveiling Copyright Ownership in the Film Industry: Legal Perspectives

Intellectual Property, Copyright1 Comment

Unveiling Copyright Ownership in the Film Industry: Legal Perspectives There is still often a question among the public about who owns the copyright for a large-scale work, such as a movie. Because movies, especially feature films, involve many derivative works and other interrelated supporting works. Starting from scripts, background music, movie posters, and even a game specifically made to promote the movie.   So, who owns the copyright of all these works? Does the Director hold everything? Producer? Or both of them?   Definition of Copyright According to Article 1 of Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (Copyright Law), what is meant by Copyright is the Exclusive Right of the Creator, which arises automatically based on declarative principles after a work is realized in actual form without reducing restrictions by the provisions of statutory regulations.   From the definition above, there are two essential emphases of Copyright as follows: 1. Exclusive Rights, consisting of: Economic Rights The Exclusive Right of the Creator or Copyright Holder to obtain economic benefits from the Work Moral Rights Rights that are eternally inherent in the Creator 2. Arises automatically based on Declarative Principles    No recording or registration is required to obtain protection.   Then, a Creator is a person or several people who produce a creation individually or together. Movies in the Copyright Law are referred to as Cinematography as mentioned in Article 40 Paragraph (1) letter (m), which means moving images, including documentary movies, advertising movies, reportages, or story films made with scenarios, including cartoon or animation films.   Cinematography works can be created on celluloid tape, video tape, video disc, optical disc, and/or other media that allows it to be shown in cinemas, big screens, television, or other media.   Copyright Holders of Movies/ Cinematography Works In general, 3 (three) parties are referred to as Copyright Holders, namely: Copyright Owner/Creator The party who legally receives the rights from the Creator Another party who receives further rights from the party who received the rights   However, if we talk about specific copyright holders for movie-related products, the details are as follows: Movie Related Products Types of Creation Notes Original/ raw/ in-editing process/ final movie. Copyright for Cinematographic Works Creator: Director Copyright Holder: Film Producer Script/ Story Copyright for Written Works Creator: Script/Story Writer Book – If the film is adapted from a book. Copyright for Books/Writing Works Creator: Book Author Adaptation Copyright Holder: Film Producer Book – If the film is adapted into a book. Copyright for Books/Writing Works Creator: Book Author Adaptation Copyright Holder: Book Publisher Background Music (BGM), scoring, soundtrack, sound effects, or other related music works. Copyright of Songs and/or Music Creator: Song Creator (can be assigned to Music Publisher) Related Rights: Musicians, Singers, and Record Producers Movie posters Copyright for Drawing/Painting Artworks Creator: Poster Designer Movie Exhibitions/ advertising/ promotions (photography, banners, etc.) Copyright for Photographic Works, Portraits, Databases, Video Games, Computer Programs, Appearances in the form of Written Works Creator: Photographer, Designer, and Game/Computer Programmer.   Knowing who the creator of the creations above is, if you are involved in them, especially if your position is the creator, you are entitled to Exclusive Rights to cinematographic works, valid for up to 50 (fifty) years from the first announcement.   Benefits of Copyright Recordation Also, please ensure your name is recorded in the Creation Recordation Letter issued by the Minister and in the General Register of Works, which serves as initial proof of ownership of a work and is substantial evidence in court. Even though it is not mandatory, Copyright recordation is beneficial for the following 2 (two) things: Prevent misuse of recorded works and simultaneously prevent losses arising from abuse of said works. Make it easier for Copyright owners to claim royalties for recorded Copyright licenses.   Should you have further questions regarding Copyright and its registration in Indonesia and abroad, do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected]. Sources: Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (Copyright Law) Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP)  

Tips-for-Registering-Holograms-as-Trademarks-in-Indonesia-affa-global

Tips for Registering Holograms as Trademarks in Indonesia

Intellectual Property, Trademark

Tips for Registering Holograms as Trademarks in Indonesia Besides Sounds and 3D objects, Holograms can be registered as Trademarks because they are equally recognized as Non-Conventional/Non-Traditional Trademarks. But what kind of Holograms can be registered as Trademarks? Do you interpret the meaning of this Hologram in the same way? Allow us to delve into the discussion.   Legal Basis For Hologram Marks In Indonesia Indonesia recognizes the existence of Hologram Marks through the elaboration of the definition of Trademark as stated in Article 1 Number 1 of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications (the Trademark Law), as follows:   A Trademark is a sign that can be displayed graphically in the form of an image, logo, name, word, letter, number, or color arrangement in 2 (two) dimensions and/or 3 (three) dimensions, sound, hologram, or a combination of 2 (two) or more of these elements to differentiate goods and/or services produced by individuals or legal entities in goods and/or services trading activities.   For a Hologram Mark to be registered, Article 4 of the Trademark Law and Article 3 of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation No.67/2016 require the attachment of a Trademark label in the form of a visual display from various sides.   This visual appearance from various sides is essential because the definition of a Hologram, according to the ‘Great Dictionary of the Indonesian Language,’ is a colored image with three dimensions on a piece of paper so that it appears as if it has arisen. So, the critical point that needs to be paid attention to for Hologram Trademarks is its embossed impression, even though it is flat, and therefore has a different color reflection effect from each side. That’s why the visual description of each side is essential and must be accurate.   Sample of Description on a Hologram Trademark For example, the Hologram Mark registered for PT. PEGADAIAN (Persero) with Application Number JID2020022485. Its appearance is only a circle, but if we look at it from various sides, an emerging effect shows the words and logos contained in it, with different effect colors appearing on each side.   So the description is, “Holograms have five image perspectives. The Front Image displays the entire hologram image (including words and logos). The Top and Right images show the words and logos in various colors. The Bottom and Left images show the words and logos in blue and purple.”   Examples of Other Hologram Marks Registered in Indonesia PT. PANCA PRATAMA INDONESIA GEN TAMEO IMAN SANTOSA Application Number: DID2022083769 Application Number: DID2022104879 Application Number: DID2020060873   From the examples of registered Hologram Marks above, it appears that words, logos, and even facial photos can be submitted as Hologram Marks, provided they do not conflict with administrative and substantive requirements. Furthermore, assuming that the application does not encounter opposition or rejection, it will only take 10-13 months from the application to obtaining the registration number.   So, have you imagined the Hologram Mark that you want to register for your business?   Should you have further questions regarding the requirements and registration of Hologram Marks in Indonesia or abroad, do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected]. Source: Directorate General of Intellectual Property