From Fake to Facts: Taking Action Against Trademark Infringement in Indonesia - AFFA IPR

From Fake to Facts: Taking Action Against Trademark Infringement in Indonesia

Intellectual Property, Trademark

Have you ever found products imitating your Trademark being sold on the market without your permission? Or even worse—your Trademark suddenly being registered by someone else? Unfortunately, such incidents still frequently occur in Indonesia. Our country has once again been placed on the “Watch List” in the 2025 Special 301 Report released by the United States Trade Representative (USTR)—indicating that Intellectual Property (IP) enforcement, including Trademarks, remains a concern for the international community.   However, that doesn’t mean there’s nothing you can do. Here are concrete solutions you can take if your Trademark is being misused in Indonesia: Ensure Your Trademark Is RegisteredThe first and most crucial step is to ensure your Trademark is officially registered with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP). Without registration, legal protection for your Trademark is extremely limited. If it hasn’t been registered yet, immediately file a Trademark application. If it has, ensure you have the registration documents and certificate(s) in hand. Gather Evidence of Infringement If you discover your Trademark is being used without authorization, collect as much evidence as possible: Photos of counterfeit or fake products; Links to online shops or marketplaces selling illegal products; Proof of purchase (if available); Screenshots of ads or promotions using your Trademark. The more comprehensive your evidence, the stronger your legal position will be. Use Reporting Mechanisms on Marketplaces and Social Media Many e-commerce platforms and social media in Indonesia now provide dedicated channels to report IP violations. If you find counterfeit products or infringing content, you can take the following actions: Fill out the IP infringement report form (Trademark); Attach your Trademark certificate and evidence of infringement; Request removal of the content or account. These steps usually can be processed more quickly and do not require going to court. Contact a Registered IP Consultant for Taking Further Legal Action(s) Dealing with Trademark infringement can be a complex and time-consuming process. That’s why working with a licensed IP Consultant is highly recommended. They can assist you with: Developing the right legal protection strategy; Supporting the filing of damages claims, infringement lawsuits, or negotiations; Coordinating with relevant authorities, such as the DGIP or the Police, when necessary. Should you need more information about Trademark protection in Indonesia, feel free to contact us at [email protected].

Trademark Registration Procedure in Indonesia - AFFA IPR

Trademark Registration Procedure in Indonesia

Trademark, Intellectual Property

Registering a Trademark in Indonesia is a critical step for any foreign business aiming to enter or expand in the Indonesian market. As Southeast Asia’s largest economy with over 270 million people, Indonesia offers significant commercial opportunities, but also presents challenges in brand protection due to its growing yet competitive market landscape.   Trademark protection in Indonesia is primarily regulated under Law No. 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications, which has been amended by Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation and Law No. 6 of 2023. With some supporting regulations include Government Regulation No. 28 of 2019 (official fees), Government Regulation No. 22 of 2018 (Madrid Protocol implementation), Government Regulation No. 90 of 2019 (Trademark Appeal Commission), and Ministry Regulation No. 67 of 2016 (as amended by Regulation No. 12 of 2021) on Trademark Registration Procedures.   Types of Marks That Can Be Registered in Indonesia   You can register: Word mark Figurative mark Combination mark Three-dimensional mark Sound mark Hologram   Indonesia adheres to the first-to-file principle, so early registration is strongly encouraged. Prior use is not considered a strong, bona fide basis of protection in Indonesia.   Types of Marks That Cannot Be Registered   The following cannot be registered: If the Mark is contrary to public order or morality If the Mark misleads consumers about the nature, quality, or origin of goods/services Generic or descriptive terms without distinctiveness Identical or similar marks already registered for similar goods/services National flags, emblems, or state symbols For 3D Mark, it cannot be a functional feature.   Requirements to Register a Trademark   Foreign businesses must appoint a local registered IP/Trademark Consultant to file on their behalf.   Documents needed: Power of attorney – simply signed Statement of Mark Ownership – simply signed Specimen of Mark to be filed Details of goods/services and relevant class(es) Applicant’s data (name and address)   If claiming priority from a foreign application, the priority document must also be submitted.   Trademark Registration Procedure in Indonesia   Please note that it may take approximately 10-14 months from filing to the issuance of Trademark certificate. The stages are as follows: Filing Formality Examination (15 days) Publication (2 months) Examination Issuance of registration number Issuance of TM Certificate (Digital Certificate only)   Post-Registration: What to Do and Remember   Once your Trademark is registered: Use your mark within 5 years to avoid any non-use cancellation action filed by any 3rd party. Monitor and enforce your rights through warning letters or legal action. Renewal is due every 10 years and can be filed within 6 months before the expiration date (or during a 6-month grace period with a penalty). Record any change of ownership or license agreements with the DGIP.   Should you need further information regarding Trademark registration and protection strategies in Indonesia, feel free to contact us at [email protected].

Extension of Time to Complete Patent Application Formality Documents - AFFA IPR

Extension of Time to Complete Patent Application Formality Documents

Patent, Intellectual Property

Indonesia’s Patent regulation has undergone significant changes following the enactment of Law No. 65 Year 2024, which amends Law No. 13 Year 2016 on Patents. One of the key amendments is the extension of time to complete the formalities in a Patent application.   Previous Regulation (Law No. 13 Year 2016) Under the previous version of Article 35: Applicants who received a notification to complete formal requirements had 3 months from the date of notification to comply. If needed, applicants could request two extensions: First extension: Up to 2 months. Second extension: Up to 1 additional month, subject to a fee.   However, the second extension (one month with a fee) was rarely utilized in practice. Many applicants who requested extensions still failed to complete the requirements, resulting in their applications being considered withdrawn.   Current Regulation (Law No. 65 Year 2024) The amended Article 35 introduces more stringent provisions: Applicants still have 3 months to complete formal requirements after receiving notification. Only one extension of up to 2 months is now permitted. Additional extension beyond the two months is only possible under emergency circumstances and requires strong supporting evidence.   Key Takeaways: The second extension option (1 month with a fee) has been repealed. The new law limits the extension to a one-time request, making compliance more challenging but streamlining the overall process.   Practical Steps for Applicants To meet the formality requirements within the given timeframe, applicants are advised to prepare the following key documents promptly: Power of Attorney (PoA) Statement of Assignment or Deed of Assignment   Failing to submit these documents within the prescribed period, including the extension, will result in the Patent application being considered withdrawn.   Comparison Table   Aspect Before Amendment (Law No. 13/2016) After Amendment (Law No. 65/2024) Initial Period to Complete Requirements 3 months from the date of the Minister’s notification 3 months from the date of the Minister’s notification First Extension Up to 2 months Up to 2 months Second Extension Additional 1 month, subject to fee Abolished Additional Extension in Emergency Cases Not explicitly regulated Allowed only in emergencies, up to 6 months, with strong supporting evidence Total Possible Duration 3 months + 2 months + 1 month (total 6 months), with the possibility of paying the fee for the final month 3 months + 2 months (total 5 months), emergency extension possible up to 6 months, but requires justification Ease for Applicants More lenient with more extension options Stricter, only one regular extension allowed Impact on Examination Timeframe Potentially longer due to multiple extensions Shorter, as fewer extensions are permitted   The recent amendment emphasizes the importance of timely compliance. Applicants are now only allowed one extension of two months, with no further routine extensions available. While this makes the process more demanding, it significantly shortens the formality examination period, enhancing efficiency in Indonesia’s Patent system. Applicants must prepare their formal documents meticulously and avoid delays to ensure the smooth processing of their applications.   You might also want to read: Steps to Take When a Patent Application is Deemed Withdrawn in Indonesia Should you need more information regarding the extension of time to complete Patent application formality documents in Indonesia, feel free to contact us via email at [email protected].

Patent Implementation in Indonesia: What happens if you don't use your Patent? - AFFA IPR

Patent Implementation in Indonesia and Its Consequences if the Patent is Not Used According to the Latest Patent Law

Intellectual Property, Patent1 Comment

A registered Patent not only grants the Exclusive Right to its owner to prohibit others from using the invention but also imposes an additional obligation to implement the Patent. This obligation is regulated under Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents, as well as Law Number 65 of 2024 concerning the Third Amendment to Law Number 13 of 2016, which has been in effect since October 28, 2024.   How is the obligation to implement a Patent regulated, and what are the legal consequences if a Patent is not used under the latest Patent Law? Here’s the summary!   Previously—and still applicable—Article 20 of the Patent Law has regulated the obligation to implement Patents in Indonesia as follows:   Product Patent: Obligated to manufacture, import, or license the product. Process Patent: Obligated to manufacture, license, or import the product resulting from the patented process. Method, System, & Use Patents: Obligated to manufacture, import, or license the product resulting from the method, system, or use.   Obligation to Implement Patents in Indonesia In this third amendment, Article 20A has been added to the Patent Law, stipulating that every Patent holder is required to submit a declaration of Patent use in Indonesia and report it to the Minister through Directorate General Intellectual Property (DGIP) at the end of each year, accompanied by proof of implementation. The implementation of the Patent may be carried out either by the Patent holder or by a third party under license from the Patent holder. The objective of this provision is to encourage technology transfer, investment, job creation, and tangible economic growth for Indonesia.   Forms of Patent implementation may include: Manufacturing goods or utilizing processes protected by the Patent in Indonesia. Transferring technology to third parties in Indonesia. Collaborating in manufacturing with local companies.   Consequences of Non-Implementation of Patents In this latest amendment, provisions regarding consequences such as compulsory licensing or Patent revocation, which were previously regulated under Articles 82 and 130 of the Patent Law, have been removed.   Instead, the annual reporting obligation as stipulated in Article 20A serves as an instrument for the government to monitor Patent utilization in Indonesia.   Although administrative sanctions for non-compliance with the reporting obligation are not explicitly regulated yet, this obligation opens the possibility for the government to issue further implementing regulations or administrative policies in the future.   Acceptable Reasons for Delayed Implementation Previously, the Patent Law allowed Patent holders to provide legitimate reasons for not yet implementing their Patent, such as:   Force majeure circumstances. Regulatory or licensing obstacles to production. Production still in preparation stages.   In the amended Patent Law, although these reasons are no longer explicitly listed, Patent holders may still include such reasons in their annual reports as part of the explanation or justification in cases where implementation has not been optimal.   You might also want to read: 5 Stages of Patent Registration Process in Indonesia Should you need further information regarding the Patent implementation in Indonesia and Its consequences if the Patent is not used, feel free to contact us at [email protected].

Calendar Days vs Working Days: Understanding Trademark Refusal Deadlines in Indonesia - AFFA IPR

Calendar Days vs Working Days: Understanding Trademark Refusal Deadlines in Indonesia

Intellectual Property, Trademark

Under Article 1 Point 22 of the Indonesian Trademark Law, the term “days” mentioned in this law refers to working days, not calendar days. However, this information can sometimes become unclear when conveyed as brief notices to IP owners or their representatives abroad. This misunderstanding often leads to incorrect expectations about the speed of application processing or even delays in document preparation, resulting in unnecessary losses.   How to Differentiate Calendar Days from Working Days?   For example, Article 24 of the Trademark Law states, “Within a maximum period of 30 (thirty) days from the date of sending the notification letter regarding an application that cannot be registered or has been rejected, the applicant or their representative may submit a written response stating their reasons,” the 30-day period here does not mean one month. Instead, it could extend to 1.5 months.   Here’s the calculation: 30 days = 30 working days Working days = Monday – Tuesday – Wednesday – Thursday – Friday (5 days per week) Thus, 30 working days = 6 weeks (30 ÷ 5) If converted into total days, it becomes 6 × 7 = 42 days Or approximately 8 weeks = 1.5 months (42 ÷ 5).   However, the exact duration will depend on whether the period includes February or months with only 30 days. It is also necessary to consider whether the period consists of public or national holidays.   What About Trademark Application Refusals Filed Through the Madrid Protocol? Example of a Trademark Refusal Notification Sent by WIPO for an Application Filed Through the Madrid Protocol   If your Trademark is filed through the Madrid Protocol, designating Indonesia as one of the target countries, and it gets refused, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) will send a complete notification, specifying: The date on which the time limit to reply begins The time limit to reply The final deadline to respond   However, the information provided by WIPO is not entirely accurate because it calculates 30 calendar days instead of 30 working days as stipulated by the Indonesian Trademark Law. This means that the deadline stated in the sample letter—February 12, 2025—is incorrect. The actual deadline should be February 21, 2025. There is a discrepancy of nine calendar days between the date stated in WIPO’s notification and the actual deadline.   Calculating deadlines based on working days may seem beneficial as it provides a longer timeframe. However, if you are looking for a faster resolution, you must be prepared for a longer waiting period, especially if there are additional public holidays not reflected in international calendars.   EXCEPT when the regulation specifies a time limit in months. For example, the period for applicants or their representatives to file an objection against an Official Trademark Gazette Announcement. According to Article 17 of the Trademark Law, it states:   “An objection shall be submitted in writing within a maximum period of 2 (two) months from the date of sending the copy of the objection received.”   In this case, you should interpret it as two full months in calendar days. Thus, your deadline is strictly 2 × 30 days, not 2 × 45 days.   To avoid such confusion, you should contact a trusted Trademark Consultant in Indonesia. With its integrated system, you will always be informed about the latest status of your Trademark. By understanding these deadlines, you can better plan and prepare the necessary budget and documents.   You might also want to read: Indonesia in BRICS: A Golden Opportunity for Further Trademark Protection Should you need more information regarding the trademark registration and protection process in Indonesia or globally, feel free to contact us via email: [email protected].

Steps to Take When a Patent Application is Deemed Withdrawn in Indonesia - AFFA IPR

Steps to Take When a Patent Application is Deemed Withdrawn in Indonesia

Intellectual Property, Patent1 Comment

Document completeness and compliance with regulations are crucial in the Patent registration process. If there are deficiencies in the documents or if certain requirements are not met, the Patent application may be considered withdrawn by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) in Indonesia. So, what steps should the applicant take next?   When a Patent application is considered withdrawn, the applicant will receive a “Notification of Patent Deemed Withdrawn” from DGIP, meaning that the application will not proceed further.   However, if the applicant wishes to continue the examination process, the applicant must immediately submit a “Request for Further Examination.” This request must be filed within a maximum of six (6) months from the issuance date of the Notification of Considered Withdrawal.    Additionally, the applicant must pay an additional fee of 50% of the application fee to submit the Request for Further Examination. After submission, the applicant will need to wait for a response from DGIP’s Formality Section, which will review the application and decide whether the Patent examination process can proceed.   Therefore, if you face challenges in completing the required documents or drafting a proper Patent application, it is highly recommended to consult with a trusted Patent Consultant to navigate this issue effectively. Otherwise, the applicant risks losing Patent rights and suffering financial losses, as the initial registration fees that have been paid will not be refunded (forfeited).   You might also want to read: 5 Stages of Patent Registration Process in Indonesia Should you need more information about Patent applications in Indonesia or globally, feel free to contact us at [email protected].

6 Key Principles of Patent Protection in Indonesia - AFFA IPR

6 Key Principles of Patent Protection in Indonesia

Intellectual Property, Patent1 Comment

Through Law Number 65 of 2024 on Patents, the Indonesian Government has revised the definition of “invention” to mean an inventor’s idea manifested in solving a specific problem in the field of technology, which can take the form of a product or process, or the improvement and development of an existing product or process.   Meanwhile, a Patent is an exclusive right granted by the state to an inventor for an invention that meets the criteria of patentability, namely novelty (new), inventive step, and industrial applicability. For Utility Models, the requirements include at least novelty, incremental improvements to existing products or processes, practical utility, and industrial applicability.   If you are an inventor, a Patent will protect your invention by granting you legal rights, enabling you to enjoy the economic benefits of your invention.   However, six key principles form the foundation of Patent protection and are crucial for safeguarding technological innovations and inventions. These principles are:   First-to-File: This principle states that the first party to file a Patent application is granted Patent rights, not the first to invent or use it. Therefore, Patent owners must file their applications as soon as possible. Patent Information: Every Patent application must include complete information about the invention, such as descriptions, claims, and drawings illustrating how the invention works. This information will be published once the application is approved, allowing the public to refer to it and encouraging further technological advancements. Protection Is Granted Only by Application: Patents are only granted if the inventor or an authorized party submits an official application. Without an application, Patent rights will not be awarded, even if the invention meets patentability requirements. Obligation to Pay Annual Fees: After a Patent is granted, the Patent holder must pay annual fees to maintain the Patent rights. Failure to pay these fees can result in the cancellation of the Patent, making the invention part of the public domain. Universal Substantive Examination: Every Patent application undergoes a substantive examination to ensure the invention meets the requirements of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. This process ensures that only truly innovative inventions are granted Patent protection. Territorial Protection: Patent rights are territorial, meaning protection is only valid in the country or region where the Patent is registered and approved. To secure protection in other countries, the inventor must file separate Patent applications in those countries.   By understanding these six principles, innovators and industry players can take the necessary steps to legally protect their inventions and maximize their economic potential.   You might also want to read: Indonesia’s Patent Law Amendment: Excluded Inventions and Change in Novelty Grace Period Should you need more information about Patent protection in Indonesia or globally, feel free to contact us at [email protected].

The Walmart Wirkin VS Hermes Birkin Controversy: A Case Study in Intellectual Property Awareness - AFFA IPR

The Walmart Wirkin VS Hermès Birkin Controversy: A Case Study in Intellectual Property Awareness

Intellectual Property, TrademarkLeave a comment

The viral phenomenon surrounding Walmart’s “Wirkin” bag, which bears a striking resemblance to the iconic Hermès Birkin, has captivated social media and sparked discussions on fashion ethics, consumer behavior, and, of course, Intellectual Property. This controversy highlights the complexities of balancing accessible fashion with protecting luxury brand exclusivity. Here’s everything you need to know.   In December 2024, a USD 78 handbag sold on Walmart’s marketplace became an overnight sensation on platforms like TikTok. Dubbed the “Wirkin” by users, the bag mimics the design of the legendary Hermès Birkin, which starts at around USD 10,000. The Wirkin’s affordability and resemblance to a luxury product spurred millions of views in unboxing videos and drew widespread attention.   Ethical and Legal Implications   Supporters argue that the Wirkin democratizes luxury, making high-end aesthetics attainable for everyday consumers. Critics counter that such “dupes” undermine the craftsmanship, exclusivity, and Intellectual Property of brands like Hermès.   From a legal perspective, Hermès could potentially claim a Trademark, specifically Trade Dress infringement, as Wirkin’s design closely imitates the recognizable elements of the Birkin. Trade Dress protects the visual appearance of a product that signifies its source to consumers. However, Walmart might defend the Wirkin by emphasizing its lack of Hermès branding and the significant price gap, arguing that consumer confusion is unlikely.   Walmart’s Response   Amid mounting scrutiny, in mid-January 2025, Walmart removed the Wirkin from its marketplace and issued a generic statement: “In some instances, products may no longer be available. We invite customers to continue exploring our expansive selection and uncover new alternatives.” This move was likely intended to minimize legal risks and preserve brand relationships.   Key Differences Between the Wirkin and Birkin   The table below highlights the critical differences between the two bags, helping consumers distinguish between them:   Feature “Wirkin” Birkin Price ~USD 78 Starts at ~USD 10,000 Logo No branding “Hermès Paris” logo under the flap Material Synthetic or imitation leather High-quality genuine leather or exotic skins Size Options Standard, typically smaller Multiple sizes (25cm, 30cm, 35cm, 40cm) Craftsmanship Mass-produced stitching Handcrafted using saddle stitching Packaging No luxury packaging Comes with Hermès orange box and dust bag Sales Platform Walmart’s e-commerce platform Exclusive to Hermès boutiques Distribution Mass-market availability Strictly controlled, often with a waitlist   From the Wirkin-Birkin case, we gain yet another insight that pricing remains a recurring source of Intellectual Property infringement. Affordable versions of well-known, especially luxury, products continue to attract significant market interest, often without regard for authenticity. However, if you are a Trademark owner, there is no need to worry, as having a registered Trademark establishes you as the rightful owner and grants you the legal authority to take action against counterfeit products. If necessary, you can further strengthen your position by registering your product design as an Industrial Design, ensuring that the aesthetic aspects of your product are also protected.   Moreover, if you are a retailer, it is crucial to understand the intricacies of Trademark law to safeguard your business reputation and avoid misleading virality, which could ultimately jeopardize your business’s sustainability. Should you need more information about Trademark protection in Indonesia or globally, feel free to contact us via email at [email protected].

Indonesia in BRICS: A Golden Opportunity for Further Trademark Protection - AFFA IPR

Indonesia in BRICS: A Golden Opportunity for Further Trademark Protection

Intellectual Property, Trademark1 Comment

As of January 2025, Indonesia has officially joined BRICS as a full member, marking a significant milestone in its economic journey. This move is expected to enhance trade and investment among member nations, creating exciting opportunities for businesses looking to expand into the region.   BRICS, initially spearheaded by Russia, now includes Brazil, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates. Together, these nations represent a powerful economic bloc, accounting for a substantial portion of global GDP and population. BRICS aims to strengthen the economies of its members, increase their global influence, and provide a counterbalance to Western-dominated economic institutions.   Indonesia’s entry into BRICS comes with a strong foundation. It already has robust trade relations with its fellow BRICS members, offering a dynamic market ripe for exploration. With its strategic location, abundant resources, and growing consumer market, Indonesia is poised to become a hub for international businesses.   This is the perfect time for foreign investors to tap into Indonesia’s vast potential. By registering your Trademark and establishing your business presence in Indonesia, you can gain a competitive edge in one of Southeast Asia’s most promising markets, now further amplified by its BRICS membership.   Indonesia’s Economic Potential in BRICS Countries Russia:  Main Exports to Indonesia: Wheat, fertilizers, and iron & steel products. Number of Registered Trademarks in Indonesia: 47 Most Class Category: 41 – Education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities. (7) 5 – Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations; sanitary preparations for medical purposes; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food for babies; plasters, materials for dressings; material for stopping teeth, dental wax; disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides. (5) 35 – Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions. (5) 44 – Medical services; veterinary services; hygienic and beauty care for human beings or animals; agriculture, horticulture and forestry services. (5) Brazil Main Exports to Indonesia: Raw sugar, soybeans, and beef. Number of Registered Trademarks in Indonesia: 55 Most Class Category: 1 – Chemicals used in industry, science and photography, as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed plastics; manures; fire extinguishing compositions; tempering and soldering preparations; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; tanning substances; adhesives used in industry. (16) 35 – Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions. (14) 29 – Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products; edible oils and fats. (13) India Main Exports to Indonesia: Organic chemicals, pharmaceutical products, and cotton. Number of Registered Trademarks in Indonesia: 2,308 Most Class Category: 5 – Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations; sanitary preparations for medical purposes; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food for babies; plasters, materials for dressings; material for stopping teeth, dental wax; disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides. (404) 12 – Vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water. (317) 9 – Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatus. (229) 35 – Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions. (205) China Main Exports to Indonesia: Electronics, machinery, and textiles. Number of Registered Trademarks in Indonesia: 44,992 Most Class Category: 9 – Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatus. (8,044) 7 – Machines and machine tools; motors and engines (except for land vehicles); machine coupling and transmission components (except for land vehicles); agricultural implements other than hand-operated; incubators for eggs. (3,439) 35 – Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions. (3,060) South Africa Main Exports to Indonesia: Coal, iron, and steel. Number of Registered Trademarks in Indonesia: 227 Most Class Category: 13 – Firearms; ammunition and projectiles; explosives; fireworks. (58) 9 – Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatus. (50) 42 – Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software. (31) Egypt Main Exports to Indonesia: Cotton, dates, and other agricultural products. Number of Registered Trademarks in Indonesia: 80 Most Class Category: 35 – Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions. (21) 34 – Tobacco; smokers’ articles; matches. (20) 30 – Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; ice. (14) 41 – Education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities. (14) 42 – Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software. (13) Ethiopia Main Exports to Indonesia: Coffee, oilseeds, and raw hides. Number of Registered Trademarks in Indonesia: N/A Most Class Category: N/A Iran Main Exports to Indonesia: Crude oil, petrochemical products, and nuts. Number of Registered Trademarks in Indonesia: 135 Most Class Category:  30 – Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; ice. (36) 29 – Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat…

Amended Definition of Patent under the Revised Indonesian Patent Law - AFFA IPR

Amended Definition of Patent under the Revised Indonesian Patent Law

Intellectual Property, Patent

The landscape of Intellectual Property in Indonesia continues to evolve, reflecting the dynamic nature of technology and innovation. One of the most significant updates in Law No. 65 of 2024, which is the third amendment to Law No. 13 of 2016 on Patents, lies in the revised definition of “Invention.”   The Old Definition Under Law No. 13 of 2016, Article 1(2) defined an invention as: “An idea of an inventor embodied into a specific problem-solving activity in the field of technology in the form of product or process, or refining and developing product or process.”   While this definition provided a foundation for Patent protection, it was deemed limited in addressing the broader advancements in technology and innovation across various industries.   The New Definition With the enactment of Law No. 65 of 2024, Article 1(2) now defines an invention as: “An idea of an inventor embodied into a specific problem-solving activity in the field of technology in the form of product and/or process, refinement, and/or development of a product and/or process, as well as systems, methods, and uses.”   Key Changes and Implications   Broader Scope: The inclusion of “systems, methods, and uses” significantly broadens the scope of what can be patented. This change acknowledges the importance of protecting technological advancements that may not fit neatly into the previous categories of “product or process.” Clarity and Flexibility: By adding “and/or” between product, process, refinement, and development, the law ensures greater flexibility in interpretation, making it more inclusive for different types of innovations. Alignment with Global Standards: The new definition aligns more closely with international Patent laws, making Indonesia a more attractive jurisdiction for inventors and businesses seeking to protect their Intellectual Property globally.   Why the Change Matters   This amendment reflects Indonesia’s commitment to adapting its Intellectual Property framework to keep pace with the rapid evolution of technology. From AI-driven systems to innovative methods in healthcare, the revised definition ensures that inventors in Indonesia have a robust legal foundation to protect and commercialize their ideas.   The revision is not only a response to domestic technological advancements but also a move to foster innovation and competitiveness in the international market. By expanding the definition, Indonesia signals its readiness to embrace emerging industries and future innovations.   For a deeper dive into the broader implications of the revised Patent Law, read our comprehensive guide: The Ultimate Guide to the Amendment of the Indonesian Patent Law. Should you need to know how this new definition impacts your business or invention, feel free to contact us at [email protected].