Amending-Patent-Claims-in-Indonesia-affa-global

Amending Patent Claims in Indonesia

Intellectual Property

Amending Patent Claims in Indonesia The Indonesian Patent Law allows Patent claims amendment at several stages from filing up to 3 months after the notice of grant has been issued by the Indonesian Patent Office under the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP). We herewith summarize under which circumstances the claim amendments are allowable in Indonesia.   Legal Basis The Law No. 13 year 2016 on Patents (hereinafter referred to as the “Patent Law”) regulates all aspects of patent protection in Indonesia, including the amendment of claims during various stages of the patent lifecycle. Article 39 of the Patent Law regulates the amendment of various natures. The rule of thumb when it comes to amendment is to ensure that it does not broaden the scope of protection initially applied for. Another rule of thumb to live by is that amendments are always possible provided that the application has not been granted by DGIP.   Article 67 and 69 of the Patent Law has made it possible for the post-grant amendment via the Patent Board of Appeal. However, the scope may be limited to the corrections on descriptions, claims, and/or figures once the application has been granted.    We herewith summarize the viability of claim amendments at various stages of the patent lifecycle for your perusal:   Amendments Prior to Publication The amendment of claims are possible, provided that the scope of protection is not broader than the originally filed claims.   Amendments After Publication The amendment of claims are possible, provided that the scope of protection is not broader than the originally filed claims.   Amendments Filed During the Substantive Examination Request The amendment of claims are possible, provided that the scope of protection is not broader than the originally filed claims.   Amendments after the Issuance of the Examination Results The amendments can still be filed after the examiner issues the examination results. From time to time, the examiner also suggests amendments for clarity’s sake. Please note that this is the last step when it comes to the pre-grant amendment and therefore the amendments shall be filed before the examiner issues the notice of grant/notice of rejection. Similar to the previous steps, the amendment is allowable provided that the the scope of protection is not broader than the originally filed claims.   Post-Grant Claim Amendments The post-grant amendment shall be filed by 3 months from the date of the Notice of Grant to the Patent Board of Appeal. The amendment is limited to several issues,  such as the corrections on descriptions, claims, and/or figures (may be due to the translation errors that were only picked up after the issuance of the Notice of Grant), limitation of the scope of claims, and clarifications on the content of the descriptions that are vague in nature.   The decision by the Patent Board of Appeal shall be issued within 6 months from the date when they start the examination.   Should you have any questions about patent amendments of various nature, please contact us at [email protected].

The-Intellectual-Property-Landscape-of-Tokusatsu-A-Comprehensive-Overview-affa

The Intellectual Property Landscape of Tokusatsu: A Comprehensive Overview

Intellectual Property

The Intellectual Property Landscape of Tokusatsu: A Comprehensive Overview Tokusatsu (特撮) is a Japanese term for live-action (non-anime) films or television programs that heavily use practical special effects. However, in its development, this genre in Japan is mainly used in movies or series with superhero themes. From giant monsters (Kaiju) such as Godzilla and Gamera, humans who turn into giant Ultraman, masked heroes riding a bike (Kamen Rider), colorful Super Sentai heroes, metallic heroes like Gavan, and many more.   In Japan, Tokusatsu has become an enormous industry. Every year, there are at least 3 (three) new series, 2 (films) on the big screen, and dozens of OTT content, with some toys that consistently record best-selling toy sales. The BANDAI toy company, as the Master Licensee of Kamen Rider, Ultraman, and Super Sentai, records revenues of around 60 billion Yen per year from the above Intellectual Properties. Of course, this is apart from the income from broadcasting rights received by Production Houses from broadcasting throughout the world.   Then, what other Intellectual Properties are related to Tokusatsu? Here is the explanation:   1.      Copyright Copyright is Intellectual Property in science, art, and literature resulting from inspiration, ability, thoughts, imagination, dexterity, skills, or expertise expressed in real form. According to the Copyright Law, the work is called Creation, and the creator is for sure called the Creator. Because one individual does not make Tokusatsu but is a joint work of several companies, the Creator can be the designer or production leader with the title of Producer, but these companies own the Copyright Holder. For example, the late Shotaro Ishinomori is recognized as the creator of the Kamen Rider series. Still, the Copyright Holder is listed as jointly owned by Ishimori Pro (Shotaro’s company), TV Asahi (the broadcasting TV station), and TOEI (the production house). Companies registered as Copyright Holders can also be seen from writing such as “(C) 2023 石森プロ・テレビ朝日・東映” in various published materials. Tokusatsu’s works related to Copyright are not only the series or films but also the songs, scripts, characterizations, illustrations, and books related to them. Copyright is protected as long as the creator is alive, plus 70 years after that, and cannot be extended. Protected here means that only the Copyright Holder has Economic Rights and Moral Rights, so that no other party may publish, duplicate, translate, adapt/arrange/transform, distribute, announce, communicate, or rent it without the permission of the Copyright Holder.   2.      Trademark Trademark in Tokusatsu is not the additional protection but the primary Intellectual Property, which makes the name unique, along with the logo, which makes it different from other works already on the market. In contrast to Copyright, which does not need to be registered, Trademarks must be registered to obtain protection. When applying for a Trademark, it is necessary to provide information about the appropriate protection classes according to its products and/or services. The number of classes registered for the Tokusatsu series, which airs throughout the year, usually reaches 22 classes, but for films, it is only around 6 (six) to a dozen. This significant difference in numbers is because broadcasts present throughout the year will also have more derivative products and services that can be produced, and all of them must be protected from the possibility of being exploited by other irresponsible parties. Some of the trademark classes that are usually registered for the Tokusatsu series that air throughout the year are classes 32 (beverages), 30 (processed food), 28 (toys), 25 (clothing), 16 (paper), and 9 (electronic equipment). Uniquely, the Trademark Registration process is open from the start of the application process, which can be accessed by the public via the Japanese Patent Information site, providing a means for fans to get a sneak peek at the name of the new Tokusatsu series, several months before the official announcement.   3.      Industrial Design In the world of Tokusatsu, there is a unique symbiotic mutualistic relationship between toy manufacturers and Copyright Holders. It is so unique that it is common knowledge that the Tokusatsu series is called a toy advertisement that airs throughout the year. As a toy manufacturer and shareholder of the Tokusatsu producers, BANDAI also provides other support, namely making character designs, so that they can be immediately ready to be produced in various kinds of toys liked by fans of various ages from abroad. The Industrial Designs for Tokusatsu toys registered by BANDAI can also be seen on the Japanese Patent Information site. Uniquely, even though the Industrial Design is registered and owned by BANDAI, all names involved in the creative process, including representatives from the production house, are still registered as the Designer. Registration of Industrial Designs for these toys is essential so that no other party makes imitation products. Because the practice of pirating Tokusatsu toys is usually done by producing the same toys but with different Trademarks. So by registering, even if these pirates escape the trap of Trademark violations, they will not escape Industrial Design violations.   4.      Patent Patents are one type of Intellectual Property that needs to be understood in Indonesia. It is as if the patent is Intellectual Property, even though it is only one type. Patents are Intellectual Property directly related to innovation and technology with novelty value. If associated with Tokusatsu, the patent protection could be in the thin but strong action figure joint technology, toy sensors that can be activated by finger movements or inserting a coded card, and BANDAI owns all the patents.   5.      Trade Secret The formula used to make a hero’s costume that is strong but light, to the right amount of chemicals to cause a significant but safe explosion, as well as other secret formulas, can be kept as Trade Secrets. These secrets make Tokusatsu a spectacle that continues to amaze fans, and all team members involved are bound by a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).   6.      License Agreement After having a recorded Copyright…

The-Strategic-Genius-of-Hiding-Trademarks-in-Plain-Sight-The-Case-of-X-Corp-affa

The Strategic Genius of Hiding Trademarks in Plain Sight: The Case of X Corp

Intellectual Property

The Strategic Genius of Hiding Trademarks in Plain Sight: The Case of X Corp In the world of business and Trademarks, it’s often a chess game with high stakes. While more giant corporations might seem to have an advantage in this intricate dance of Intellectual Property, a move is so strategic yet surprisingly underutilized. It involves the clever art of hiding your intentions while securing valuable Trademark rights. This game plan is akin to hiding in plain sight and is more common than you think. One of the most recent examples? Elon Musk’s Twitter-to-X transformation.   It’s been three months since the tech mogul announced his brainchild, Twitter, would undergo a radical name change to simply ‘X.’ Yet, the element of surprise was maintained impeccably. The company’s first “X” Trademark filings with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) only occurred on September 22. Intriguingly, these filings weren’t initiated within the United States but instead on the vibrant shores of Jamaica back in March.   So, what’s the secret sauce to this cunning move? Priority. The priority date is a vital element in the Trademark universe. By initially filing the “X” Trademarks in Jamaica, the masterminds at X Corp gained a crucial head start without giving away the existence of their filings. How did they do this? Through a globally binding treaty known as the Paris Convention.   The Paris Convention, inked by 178 countries, allows companies to take a strategic step. Suppose a Trademark is filed in one of these countries. In that case, it can be filed in any of the other signatory countries within six months while retaining the priority date of the original filing. The “X” Trademark’s Jamaican journey was pivotal in this context. Filed on March 24, 2023, it laid the foundation for the X Corp’s United States Trademark filings on September 22, 2023.   This move is nothing short of genius. While traditional “squatters” might have attempted to stake claims over the past two months, they now find themselves behind X Corp’s queue. In the complex world of intellectual property, the strategic deployment of geography and treaties can be a game-changer. As the name ‘X’ heralds a new era for Twitter, it’s a testament to how intellectual property strategies can be both intelligent and remarkably effective, hiding in plain sight until the right moment to strike. It’s a lesson in how thinking several moves ahead can protect your assets and, in this case, a company’s name from potential spoilers.   But then, it is possible in the US to obtain a trademark registration on a single letter. Under US law, given the amount of market presence that Twitter/X has, distinctiveness is not an issue preventing this mark’s registration. But it is more likely a problem in other countries around the world.   If you look at the current database from the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), apart from the United States, “X” has also been submitted in Canada, Mexico, and the European Union. Indonesia, which is also one of the member countries of the Paris Convention, is not a destination because regulations will hamper registration of this one-letter mark unless it is considered a well-known mark.   Should you require further consultation regarding Trademark registration in Indonesia or abroad, please contact us at [email protected]. Source: Josh Gerben: Twitter/X Has Finally Made Its “X” Trademark FIlings With The USPTO

Racing-Ahead-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-IP-in-MotoGP-affa-global

Racing Ahead: A Comprehensive Guide to IP in MotoGP

Intellectual Property1 Comment

Racing Ahead: A Comprehensive Guide to IP in MotoGP   The 2023 Mandalika MotoGP in Indonesia on October 15 again brought Ducati racer Francesco Bagnaia to the top of the standings with 346 points. The event, officially called “Pertamina Grand Prix of Indonesia 2023”, is the 15th race of the 20 MotoGP World Championship series, which is in a year generating a turnover of around 500 million Euros or about 8.3 trillion Rupiah.   Dorna Sports S.L., a company from Spain that has held MotoGP Commercial Rights from the Fédération Internationale de Motocyclisme (FIM) since 1992. In Dorna’s hands, the fastest motorbike racing event on land has become the most expensive in the world with its Intellectual Property business. In 2021, Dorna Sports successfully recorded 137 million Euros just from selling Broadcast Rights to various TV and streaming platforms to broadcast each competition live. Income from Broadcasting Rights is said to reach 66% of the total income from all Intellectual Property (IP) businesses carried out. So, what other IPs are related to the implementation of MotoGP?   Trademark The first is, of course, MotoGP’s unique naming and logo. Dorna has registered MotoGP in 22 existing Trademark classes, whose protection extends to 53 countries worldwide. Of the 22 Trademark classes, it includes class 25 (clothing, shoes, hats), 28 (toys), and 30 (tea & coffee), apart from, of course, class 41 (sports activities), which is the core of its business. In Indonesia, the “MotoGP” Trademark is still protected until 2027 and can be extended every ten years.   Apart from that, Dorna also registered Trademarks for various derivative businesses related to MotoGP, such as MotoGP Kids, MotoGP VIP Village, and MotoGP Legends. By registering all the Trademarks, Dorna has become the owner of the Exclusive Rights to MotoGP and prevents the possibility of other parties registering identical or similar names in the future.   Copyright Race materials, images, promotions, and other content related to MotoGP are included in the Copyright category. As the holder of Commercial Rights to MotoGP, Dorna also owns the Copyright to MotoGP. Thus, it has the right to regulate and control the use of all Copyrights related to MotoGP, including Broadcast Rights, to broadcast the race live on various platforms worldwide. The granting of Broadcasting Rights licenses is the most significant income for Dorna. It has been recorded that from 2015 to 2021, except for 2020, there has always been an increase in revenue from Broadcasting Rights. It started from 105, 115, 125, 135, 130, and 137 million Euros (around 2.3 trillion Rupiah) in 2021. For the 2023 MotoGP World Championship, there are more than 90 channels that are official broadcasters, representing 63 countries in the world. In Indonesia, MotoGP broadcast rights are held by Trans7, MNC Vision, KVision, UseeTV, and Maxstream-SpoTV.   Patent A large-scale sports competition, especially one related to the automotive industry, indeed cannot be separated from technological inventions, whether closely related to engine construction and speed or safety equipment, which are objects that can be patented. MotoGP has also become a place for innovation competition between motorbike manufacturers and safety equipment to get maximum exposure before the technology is applied to commercial products sold to the public.   Industrial Design Suppose the design of a motorbike, riding equipment, safety equipment, and other racing equipment does not contain elements of inventions but still has an aesthetic novelty design. In that case, it can be registered and receive Industrial Design protection. The most straightforward example is the commercialization of helmets used by MotoGP racers.   Trade Secret Specific racing strategies are Trade Secrets, including technical details and other confidential information. These secrets give MotoGP teams a competitive advantage by not disclosing certain important information to competitors, and all team members involved are bound by a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).   Domain Name Domain names related to MotoGP are significant for maintaining online presence and marketing. Dorna has registered “motogp.com” to prevent cybersquatting and brand misuse. This domain is also available in many languages, including Indonesian, to facilitate the marketing and disseminating of official information to all media and MotoGP fans worldwide.   Licensing Agreement Apart from the Copyright previously mentioned, the License Agreement can also cover other Intellectual Property regimes, such as Brand Licenses to produce and sell merchandise, mobile phone applications, video games, and many more. Because if we talk about business, a robust Intellectual Property License Agreement can mutually benefit all parties involved.   From Dorna Sports’ financial report in 2021, more than 100 million Euros were spent on organizing MotoGP. However, they managed to record a profit of 46 million from revenue of 207 million Euros. This figure is undoubtedly quite fantastic for sporting activities supported by solid IPs.   Because a successful sports business is also an Intellectual Property business, would you be serious about getting into it? In that case, you can start on the most miniature scale, from events that are local but have the potential for a broad audience, and continue to present exciting and competitive matches so that more and more parties are interested in joining in getting a license.   If you need further information about Licensing Agreements, Trademark registration, Patent protection, or anything related to Intellectual Property, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].

Porsches-Sound-Trademark-Appeal-A-Battle-of-Electric-Car-Acoustics-affa-global

Porsche’s Sound Trademark Appeal: A Battle of Electric Car Acoustics

Intellectual Property

Porsche’s Sound Trademark Appeal: A Battle of Electric Car Acoustics In the rapidly evolving world of electric vehicles (EVs), car manufacturers are racing to perfect the technology and the auditory experience. With the calm acceleration of EVs, the industry has turned to artificial sounds to alert pedestrians and create a unique brand identity. One such innovator, Porsche, known for its iconic sports cars, embarked on the journey to craft a distinct sound for its EVs. However, their recent efforts hit a roadblock when European Trademark authorities rejected their sound Trademark Application, deeming it unmemorable. Porsche is revving its legal engines to prove their engineered sound deserves recognition.   Porsche’s quest began in November 2022 when they submitted a distinctive sound meant to replace the near-silence of an electric vehicle accelerating. While Porsche’s unique creation may remind some of everyday sounds like a vacuum cleaner or a VHS tape rewinding, the motivation behind these sound Trademarks goes beyond whimsy. Car-makers must ensure that vision-impaired pedestrians can readily identify approaching electric vehicles by sound. However, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) needed to be convinced, citing a lack of distinctiveness and memorability as grounds for rejection.   EUIPO went further, contending that Porsche’s sound imitation too closely resembled a traditional internal combustion engine’s roar, making it indistinguishable as a Porsche. In the world of IP, the question wasn’t about realism but rather the sound’s ability to set Porsche apart from its competitors. Porsche countered, emphasizing that the sound was a deliberate creation, a product of ingenuity that extended beyond mere imitation.   Porsche also drew parallels to iconic sound trademarks like the Lightsabers from Star Wars and KITT‘s scanner from the Knight Rider television series, highlighting that simplicity didn’t diminish their memorability. They also pointed out a precedent set by their rival, BMW, which secured approval for a fake acceleration sound as a sound Trademark made by an Academy Award-winner Hans Zimmer.   The appeal now rests on the fine line between uniqueness and memorability. Will Porsche’s engineered sound earn its rightful place in the EV soundscape, or will it be forever silenced in the world of sound Trademarks? As the battle unfolds, Porsche’s appeal sets a notable precedent for the legal recognition of sound in the realm of Intellectual Property. Please stay tuned for more updates on this case as we witness the intersection of automotive innovation and Intellectual Property rights.   In Indonesia, registering sounds as Trademarks is also common. For example, we have Tokopedia, Walls, Mamypoko, and Netflix with its “ta-dum” already registered in the Indonesian Trademark Office (Directorate General Intellectual Property/ DGIP). The registration is somewhat different because it is included in the non-traditional Trademark category, namely by providing a more detailed description. It must consist of a sound recording accompanied by a notation or sonogram (visualization of the sound resulting from ultrasonic examination).   Should you require further consultation regarding Sound Trademark registration in Indonesia or abroad, please contact us at [email protected]. Source: DRIVE

Beyond-the-Racket-Intellectual-Property-in-the-World-of-Badminton-affa-global

Beyond the Racket: Intellectual Property in the World of Badminton

Intellectual Property

Beyond the Racket: Intellectual Property in the World of Badminton The 2022 Asian Games ended yesterday with a victory for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) with 383 medals. This achievement is far beyond Japan and South Korea, who are in second and third place with 188 and 190 medals. It is called the 2022 Asian Games because this 4 (four) annual event was supposed to be held in 2022, but due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was finally shifted to September-October 2023, still in Hangzhou, China.   Of the 40 sports that are contested, 481 competitions have their charm. Imagine the enormous potential for sponsors when billions of eyes from different countries are focused on their favorite matches. Local brands can be instantly recognized throughout Asia.   The Trademark is not only displayed on the sidelines but also on the team shirts of each country. Therefore, the team’s failure to compete until the end is also a loss for their sponsors.   At the 2022 Asian Games, the Indonesian Badminton Team failed to win a medal for the first time since competing in 1962. So, what kind of Intellectual Property is there in Badminton?   1.     Copyrights Copyright Law applies to various aspects of Badminton, including written materials like coaching manuals, training guides, and literature related to the sport. Photographs and videos of Badminton matches, tournaments, and events are protected by Copyright. The rights to reproduce, distribute, and display these materials are typically owned by the creators, organizations, or governing bodies involved in Badminton.     Copyrights also apply to broadcasting and live streaming of Badminton matches and events. Broadcasting companies and event organizers have exclusive rights to transmit these events, and unauthorized use can lead to Copyright Infringement claims.   2.    Trademarks Trademarks protect logos, brand names, symbols, and mascots associated with Badminton equipment manufacturers, event organizers, and governing bodies. For example, recognizable Trademarks like the Yonex logo are protected to prevent unauthorized use that could confuse consumers or dilute the brand’s reputation.     When discussing a big event like the Asian Games, mascots and merchandise cannot be missed because many participants and spectators will hunt for merchandise as souvenirs. For this reason, the organizer needs to register the event name in various Trademark classes that protect merchandise products.   3.    Patents Patents come into play when Badminton equipment or technological innovations are developed. This could include Patent protection for new racket designs, shuttlecock technologies, or other equipment that offers a unique and inventive solution. These Patents prevent others from making, selling, or using these innovations without permission.     4.    Trade Secrets Some aspects of Badminton, especially proprietary techniques or training methods used by elite athletes or coaches, may be considered Trade Secrets. These are typically not publicly disclosed and are protected by maintaining their confidentiality. Unauthorized access or disclosure can lead to legal action.   It’s important to note that the specific IP regimes and their enforcement can vary from country to country and depend on the agreements between stakeholders in Badminton, such as equipment manufacturers, athletes, event organizers, and governing bodies. Legal protections are in place to encourage innovation, protect commercial interests, and ensure that the sport is conducted fairly and with respect for the Intellectual Property of all involved parties.   If you need further information about Trademark registration, Patent protection, or anything related to Intellectual Property, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].

Switzerland-Maintains-Its-Innovation-Leadership-in-2023-Indonesia-Secures-61st-Position-affa-global

Switzerland Maintains Its Innovation Leadership in 2023; Indonesia Secures 61st Position

Intellectual Property1 Comment

Switzerland Maintains Its Innovation Leadership in 2023; Indonesia Secures 61st Position The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Global Innovation Index (GII) 2023 has been released, and it reveals that global innovation is on the rise, with the average GII score reaching an all-time high of 35.9. Switzerland leads with 67.6 points and Angola is in last place, 132nd, with only 10.3.   The GII ranks 132 countries based on their seven innovation performance categories, further divided into several criteria to generate these points. The details are as follows: 1. Institutions a. Institutional Environment i. Operational Stability for Businesses ii. Government Effectiveness b. Regulatory Environment i. Regulatory Quality ii. Rule of Law iii. Cost of Redundancy Dismissal c. Business Environment i. Policies for Doing Business ii. Entrepreneurship Policies and Culture   2. Human Capital & Research a. Education i. Expenditure on Education ii. Government Funding per Student iii. School Life Expectancy iv. PISA Scales in Reading, Maths, and Science v. Student-Teacher Ratio b. Tertiary Education i. Tertiary Environment ii. Graduates in Science and Engineering iii. Tertiary Inbound Mobility c. Research and Development (R&D) i. Researchers ii. Gross Expenditure on R&D iii. Global Corporate R&D Investors iv. Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) University Ranking   3. Infrastructure a. Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) i. ICT Access ii. ICT Use iii. Government Online Service iv. E-Participation b. General Infrastructure i. Electricity Output ii. Logistic Performance iii. Gross Capital Information c. Ecological Sustainability i. GDP per Unit of Energy Use ii. Environmental Performance iii. ISO 14001 Environment   4. Market Sophistication a. Credit i. Finance for Startups and Scaleups ii. Domestic Credit to Private Sector iii. Loans from Microfinance Institutions b. Investment i. Market Capitalization ii. Venture Capital (VC) Investors iii. VC Recipients iv. VC Received c. Trade, Diversification, and Market Scale i. Applied Tariff Rate ii. Domestic Industry Diversification iii. Domestic Market Scale   5. Business Sophistication a. Knowledge Workers i. Knowledge-Intensive Employment ii. Firms Offering Formal Training iii. GERD Performed by Business iv. GERD Financed by Business v. Females Employed with Advanced Degrees b. Innovation Linkages i. University-Industry R&D Collaboration ii. State of Cluster Development iii. GERD Financed by Abroad iv. Joint Venture/ Strategic Alliance v. Patent Families c. Knowledge Absorption i. Intellectual Property Payments ii. High-Tech Imports iii. ICT Services Imports iv. FDI Net Inflows v. Research Talent   6. Knowledge & Technology Outputs  a. Knowledge Creation i. Patents by Origin ii. PCT Patents by Origin iii. Utility Models by Origin iv. Scientist and Technical Articles v. Citable Documents H-Index b. Knowledge Impact i. Labor Productivity Growth ii. Unicorn Valuation iii. Software Spending iv. High-Tech Manufacturing c. Knowledge Diffusion i. Intellectual Property Receipts ii. Production and Export Complexity iii. High-Tech Exports iv. ICT Services Exports v. ISO 9001 Quality   7. Creative Outputs  a. Intangible Assets i. Intangible Asset Intensity ii. Trademarks by Origin iii. Global Brand Value iv. Industrial Design by Origin b. Creative Goods and Services i. Cultural and Creative Services Exports ii. National Feature Films iii. Entertainment and Media Market iv. Creative Goods Exports c. Online Creativity i. Generic Top-Level Domains ii. Country-Code Top-Level Domains iii. GitHub Commits iv. Mobile App Creation   Switzerland tops the GII rankings for the 13th year in a row, followed by Sweden, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. The top 10 economies are all high-income countries. Still, several middle-income countries are also performing well in innovation, such as Indonesia joining China, Türkiye, India, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and Vietnam as the most impressive innovation climbers of the last decade.     For the 13th consecutive year, Switzerland ranks first in the GII. It is the global leader in innovation outputs, ranking first in both Knowledge and technology outputs and Creative outputs. Sweden overtakes the United States (US) to climb to second position. Sweden leads in Business sophistication (1st), Infrastructure (2nd), and Human capital and research (3rd). It holds top positions for its Researchers (1st) and Knowledge-intensive employment (3rd). The United States continues to head the league table of scoring best in the world in 13 of the 80 GII 2023 innovation indicators. It is number one in the world in indicators that include Global corporate R&D investors, Venture capital received, the quality of its universities, the combined valuation of its unicorn companies (a new GII indicator), software spending, and the value of corporate Intangible asset intensity.   Singapore enters the top five leading in South East Asia, East Asia, and Oceania (SEAO) region economies. Finland (6th) gets closer to the top five, gaining three ranks this year. It comes top worldwide in Infrastructure (1st).   Denmark (9th) and the Republic of Korea (10th) remain in the top 10. France (11th) gets closer, improving one rank this year, while Japan remains strong as the 13th most innovative economy. Israel re-enters the top 15, reaching 14th place.     After a rapid ascent, gaining 23 positions over the last decade, China ranks 12th this year, dropping one rank relative to 2022. China remains the sole middle-income economy to secure a position among the top 30, retaining 3rd place in the SEAO region and top spot in the upper middle-income group. Apart from China, there are only four other middle-income economies among the top 40 economies, namely, Malaysia (36th), Bulgaria (38th), Türkiye (39th) and India (40th).   Standout Countries’ 4-year Innovation Surge, 2019–2023 In the last four years, and since the pandemic, Saudi Arabia (48th), Brazil (49th), Mauritius (57th), Indonesia (61st), and Pakistan (88th) ascended most in the GII, in order of their rank progression.      In 2019, Indonesia was ranked 85th with 29.7 points. In 2020, although the points decreased to 26.5, the ranking remained at number 85. The increase was only one point in the following years (2021-2022), but it was enough to increase the ranking to the top 75. Of course, The peak this year is 61st place with 31.3 points.   Indonesia makes marked improvements in innovation outputs, notably in Knowledge Creation and Online Creativity. It excels in…

The-Coffee-Business-and-Intellectual-Property-A-Perfect-Blend-affa-global

The Coffee Business and Intellectual Property: A Perfect Blend

Intellectual Property

The Coffee Business and Intellectual Property: A Perfect Blend The world of coffee is a flavorful fusion of tradition and innovation. From unique blends to cutting-edge brewing methods, the coffee industry is rich with Intellectual Property opportunities. In this article, we’ll explore the various aspects of Intellectual Property, from Trademarks to Patents, Copyrights, and more, and how they’re intertwined with the coffee business. Whether you’re a coffee connoisseur or a seasoned roaster, here’s a breakdown of the fundamental Intellectual Properties related to the coffee industry:   Trademarks Coffee Brand Names Trademarks protect the unique names and logos of coffee brands. Think of iconic brands like “Starbucks” or “Kapal Api.” Coffee Shop Names Trademarks also apply to coffee shop names, creating brand recognition for businesses like “The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf” or “Kenangan Coffee.”   Patents Coffee Brewing Technology Patents protect innovative coffee brewing methods and machines—for instance, the invention of the espresso machine in 1884 by an Italian inventor, Angelo Moriondo. Coffee Roasting Equipment Patents can cover advancements in coffee roasting technology, ensuring that unique processes are protected.   Copyrights Coffee Art and Labels Coffee packaging often includes artistic designs and labels. Copyrights safeguard these creative elements. Coffee Literature Copyrights can apply to books, articles, or marketing materials related to coffee, including coffee history, brewing guides, and more.   Trade Secrets Coffee Blends Coffee companies may have closely guarded trade secrets related to their unique coffee blends and recipes. Roasting Profiles The specific roasting profiles for different coffee beans can also be considered Trade Secrets.   Geographical Indications Origin-Based Labels Some coffee regions, like Arabica Gayo coffee or Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee, are known for their distinct flavors. Geographical Indications protect these regional characteristics.   Industrial Designs Coffee Machine Aesthetics The design of coffee machines, from espresso makers to grinders, can be protected by Industrial Design rights. Unique Packaging The distinctive packaging of coffee products, making them easily recognizable on store shelves, can also be registered as Industrial Design.   Plant Variety Protection Unique Coffee Varieties: Specific coffee plant varieties may sometimes be protected to ensure that only authorized growers can cultivate them. For example, Gayo Arabica coffee has several varieties registered as Plant Variety Protection in Indonesia.   Licensing & Franchising Agreements Distribution Rights To distribute a specific brand of coffee, you must obtain official approval from the owner, stating several details, such as distribution scope, licensing validity period, and how much royalties can be given. Franchising Coffee businesses with networked shops usually have a franchise agreement, where the franchisee has obtained permission from the franchisor with a registered Trademark to open a coffee shop based on a predetermined business model.   From a coffee business, there are many additional opportunities to increase income from various existing Intellectual Property, and it would be a shame if they were not maximized. If you need further information about Trademark registration, Patent protection, or anything related to Intellectual Property, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].

Asia-Business-Law-Journal-Names-AFFA-IPR-as-The-Top-Law-Firm-in-Indonesia-for-IP-Enforcement-affa

Asia Business Law Journal Names AFFA IPR as The Top Law Firm in Indonesia for IP Enforcement

Intellectual Property

Asia Business Law Journal Names AFFA IPR as The Top Law Firm in Indonesia for IP Enforcement AFFA Intellectual Property Rights has been the fortress guarding our clients’ invaluable IP assets for over two decades. Our journey, which commenced in 1999 under the visionary leadership of our founder, the late Achmad Fatchy, has now found its course under the capable guidance of Emirsyah Dinar as Managing Partner and Fariz Syah Alam as Trademark Partner. With a formidable team of over 70 IP experts, we have consistently delivered unwavering support to our clients.   We proudly serve a diverse clientele, ranging from esteemed government entities and state-owned enterprises to industry giants within Indonesia, extending our reach to East Timor and beyond. The faith bestowed upon us by our clients fuels our commitment to excellence.   Winning an award from Asia Business Law Journal is a testament to your trust in us as your legal partner. This accolade is not just a token of recognition; it represents our unwavering dedication to delivering the best legal solutions to our valued clients like you. Asia Law Business Journal is highly regarded for its rigorous evaluation process, ensuring that only the most deserving firms and practitioners receive these honors.  This award reaffirms our commitment to excellence and innovation in the legal field. We are truly grateful for your continued support and trust, and we look forward to achieving even more significant milestones together in the future.  

번역의-어려움-인도네시아-특허-번역본-제출에-대한-최종-가이드-affa

번역의 어려움 – 인도네시아 특허 번역본 제출에 대한 최종 가이드

Intellectual Property

번역의 어려움 – 인도네시아 특허 번역본 제출에 대한 최종 가이드 최근 몇 년간 인도네시아가 특허출원국으로 주목을 받으면서 점점 더 많은 국제출원 신청인이 국적국에서 또는 PCT 국제출원 방식으로 선출원을 통해 인도네시아에 특허출원을 제출했습니다. 그러나 특허 설명서, 청구범위, 그림 및 개요는 인도네시아어(바하사 인도네시아)로 번역되기 전에 다른 언어로 먼저 제출될 가능성이 높습니다.   특허청에 인도네시아어 번역본을 제출하는 법적 근거 특허 설명서, 청구범위, 그림 및 개요를 영어로 제출할 수 있는 세계의 다른 관할권과는 달리, 특허에 관한 법률 2016년 제13호 제34조에 따라 특허 설명서는 특허출원 신청서 제출일로부터 영업일 기준 30일 안에 인도네시아어로 번역되어야 합니다.     특허출원에 관한 법무 인권부 규정 2018년 제38호 또한 특허법이 규정한 요건을 강화합니다.   실무적인 측면에서 살펴보면, 심사관이 전술한 문서의 인도네시아어 번역본을 받아야 출원서를 적시에 효율적으로 심사할 수 있습니다.   번역본 제출 지연의 결과 출원 신청인이 정해진 기한 안에 번역본을 제출하지 못하는 경우, 특허출원이 철회된 것으로 간주합니다.   인도네시아어 번역본의 일반적인 문제 저희의 경험에 따르면, 심사관이 설명서, 청구범위, 그림 및 개요에 사용된 특정 기술 용어에 의견을 달리하는 몇몇 사례가 있었습니다. 이는 매우 흔하게 일어나고 일반적인 경우로, 신청인은 해당 용어를 사용하거나 이의를 제기할 수 있지만, 주장을 과학적으로 뒷받침할 수 있어야 합니다.   인도네시아어 번역이 적절히 이루어지지 않은(즉, 서투른 기계번역) 사례도 있었습니다. 항상 CAT(컴퓨터 지원 번역) 툴을 이용할 수 있는 능력을 갖춘 숙련된 특허 번역가와 협력하는 것이 최선입니다. 특허출원 신청서 및 번역본의 복잡성과 중요성을 고려하여 많은 신청인이 숙련된 인도네시아 변리사의 전문적인 도움을 구하고 있습니다. 이러한 전문가들은 번역을 포함한 전반적인 절차를 안내하여 현지 규정을 확실하게 준수합니다.   비용 고려사항 인도네시아에서 특허출원을 준비하는 경우 번역 서비스 비용이 발생할 수 있으므로 반드시 이 비용에 대한 예산을 책정해야 합니다. 귀하의 지적 자산을 효과적으로 보호하기 위해 고품질의 정확한 번역에 투자하는 것은 충분히 가치가 있습니다.   특허 설명서, 청구범위 및 그림을 인도네시아어 번역본으로 제출하는 것은 세부 사항에 주의를 기울이고 법적 요건을 준수해야 하는 세심한 과정입니다. 이는 인도네시아 시장에서 귀하의 지적 자산을 보호하고 귀하의 특허출원이 완전하고 유효한지 확인하는 데 중요한 단계입니다.   인도네시아에서 특허 제출에 관해 질문이 있는 경우 언제든지 [email protected]로 문의해 주십시오.