TETRIS-The-License-Dispute-That-Rocked-the-Soviet-Union-affa-global

TETRIS: The License Dispute That Rocked the Soviet Union

The Tetris movie hits Apple TV Plus on March 31st and since then has given a fascinating look at the legal battle over the rights to one of the most popular video games of all time. The film follows the story of Henk Rogers, a Dutch-Indonesian video game designer who helped to bring Tetris to the West. Rogers faced many challenges in securing the rights to the game, including a complex web of Intellectual Property ownership in the Soviet Union. The film provides a valuable glimpse into the challenges of protecting intellectual property rights in a globalized marketplace. For Intellectual Property practitioners, the Tetris movie offers some insights. First, the film shows the importance of securing all necessary rights to a product or service before bringing it to market. Rogers was able to secure the rights to Tetris in Japan, but he faced challenges in securing the rights in other countries. This is a common problem for businesses that operate in multiple jurisdictions. Second, the film shows the importance of understanding the different types of Intellectual Property protection available. Rogers had to navigate a complex web of Copyright, Trademark, and Patent law to secure the rights to Tetris. Intellectual Property practitioners must be familiar with all the different types of Intellectual Property protection to advise their clients effectively. Third, the film shows the importance of enforcing Intellectual Property rights. Rogers was able to secure the rights to Tetris, but he faced challenges in enforcing those rights against infringers. Intellectual Property practitioners need to be prepared to take legal action to protect their client’s rights. In addition to the insights mentioned above, the Tetris movie also shows the importance of working with local lawyers in foreign jurisdictions, the importance of being aware of the different cultural norms that may affect intellectual property protection, and the importance of being prepared to compromise to resolve. Overall, the Tetris movie is a valuable resource for Intellectual Property practitioners. The film provides several insights that can help practitioners to protect their clients’ Intellectual Property rights better.   If you need more information about how to protect your IP(s) in Indonesia and other countries, please do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected].

Indonesian-National-Research-and-Innovation-Agency-Targets-800-New-Patents-in-2023-affa-global

Indonesian National Research and Innovation Agency Targets 800 New Patents in 2023

The National Research and Innovation Agency (Indonesian: Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, BRIN) is a Non-Ministry Government Institution (Indonesian: Lembaga Pemerintah Non-Kementerian, LPNK) which is under and responsible to the President of Indonesia through the minister in charge of government affairs in the field of research and technology. President Joko Widodo first formed this institution through Presidential Regulation Number 74 of 2019 which is attached to the Ministry of Research and Technology (Indonesian: Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi, Kemenristek) so that the Minister of Research and Technology also acts as the Head of BRIN. In the second period of President Joko Widodo’s administration in 2021, the Ministry of Research and Technology was merged into the Ministry of Education and Culture. Still, the Head of BRIN was held by someone other than the Minister of Education. For this reason, the President appointed the Head of the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (Indonesian: Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, LIPI), Dr. Laksana Tri Handoko, who also has several patents in physics. Since then, LIPI together with 3 (three) other LPNKs, namely the Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (Indonesian: Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi, BPPT), the National Nuclear Energy Agency (Indonesian: Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional, BATAN), and the National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (Indonesian: Lembaga Penerbangan dan Antariksa Nasional, LAPAN) were merged into BRIN. With this fusion, BRIN has 12 Research Organizations (RO) based on scientific fields, namely: Nuclear Energy Research Organization Earth and Maritime Research Organization Social Sciences and Humanities Research Organization Aviation and Space Research Organization Archaeological, Language, and Literary Research Organization Governance, Economics, and Public Welfare Research Organization Agriculture and Food Research Organization Biological and Environmental Research Organization Health Research Organization Energy and Manufacturing Research Organization Electronics and Informatics Research Organization Nanotechnology and Materials Research Organization   With this many ROs, BRIN targets that in accumulation, all of the ROs above will result in 800 patent applications in 2023. However, according to Deputy for Research and Innovation Facilities at BRIN Agus Haryono, until the second quarter of 2023, only 16 patents have been filed. Of course, it can be said that it is still very far from the target. However, if you look at BRIN’s previous performance, there are already more than 2,500 Intellectual Property managed, most of which came from 2,371 Patents, 352 Copyrights, 122 Industrial Designs, 46 Trademarks, and 17 Plant Variety Protection (PVP).   Sources: Bisnis.com BRIN

Super-Mario-Bros-Huge-Success-affa-global

Super Mario Bros, Huge Success of a Video Game IP on the Big Screen

The Super Mario Bros. Movie is a 2023 American computer-animated comedy film produced by Illumination Entertainment and distributed by Universal Pictures. Based on a video game franchise of the same name that was first released in 1985. The film was directed by Aaron Horvath and Michael Jelenic, and stars Chris Pratt as Mario, Charlie Day as Luigi, Anya Taylor-Joy as Princess Peach, and Jack Black as Bowser. In the film, Mario and his brother Luigi team up to rescue Princess Peach from Bowser. The film was released in the United States on April 7, 2023. It received mixed reviews from critics, but was a true box office success, grossing over $1.21 billion worldwide while the budget was only $100 million. The film became the highest-grossing film of 2023, the highest-grossing film based on a video game, and the highest-grossing animated film of 2023. With those records, this movie has beaten ‘John Wick: Chapter 4,’ ‘Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania,’ ‘Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3,’ and all ‘Toy Story’ movies that are owned by Disney-Pixar. Since its first release, the Super Mario Bros franchise designed by Shigeru Miyamoto and Takashi Tezuka has become a cultural icon and a household name around the world. The Italian plumber Mario and Luigi have entertained gamers for over three decades, appearing in more than 200 games and generating billions of dollars in revenue, with more than 58 million copies sold worldwide. The decision to bring Super Mario Bros to the big screen once again is a smart move for Nintendo, the company behind the franchise. In recent years, the company has made a concerted effort to expand the reach of its IP beyond video games, with successful ventures into mobile games, merchandise, and theme parks. The upcoming park would be in Singapore and it is scheduled to open in 2025. With the popularity of the franchise showing no signs of waning, it seems that Mario and his friends will continue to be a beloved part of popular culture for years to come. In conclusion, having an established IP can provide a promising future for any individual or company in the entertainment industry. It offers a recognized brand and loyal fanbase that can increase revenue through various streams of merchandise, licensing, and media adaptations. With the rise of new technologies and platforms, the potential for growth and success is only expanding. However, do not forget to protect and manage the IP to maintain its value and integrity. With proper management and strategic planning, an established IP can continue to thrive and bring joy to audiences for years to come.   If you need more information about how to protect your IP(s) in Indonesia and other countries, please do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected]. Source: Boxofficemojo.com    

Protecting-Your-Food-Recipes-affa-global

Protecting Your Food Recipes: A Step-by-Step Guide

Your food recipes are a valuable asset. They represent your creativity, hard work, and passion. That’s why it’s important to protect them as a trade secret from being stolen or plagiarized. Here are some tips on how to protect your food recipes: Document Your Recipe. This means writing down the ingredients, measurements, and steps involved in making the recipe. Be as specific and detailed as possible. Keep Your Recipe Secret. Don’t share it with anyone, not even friends, family, or colleagues. If you do share it with someone, make sure they sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Also, consider the following steps: a) Use a password-protected computer or file-sharing service to store your recipes. b) Don’t post your recipes on social media or other public forums. c) If you are considering selling your recipes, be sure to consult with an attorney to discuss your options. d) If the recipe is not documented in a digital document, please ensure to keep it in a restricted place (i.e. safe deposit box). Keep Your Recipe Documentation Updated As you continue to refine and improve your recipe, be sure to keep your documentation up to date. This will ensure that you always have an accurate and complete record of your recipe, which can be useful in the event of a legal dispute. By following these tips, you can help protect your food recipes and trade secret from being stolen or plagiarized. So, go ahead and share your culinary creations with the world, knowing that you have taken steps to protect your trade secret.   If you need more advice for protecting your trade secret in Indonesia and other countries, please do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected]. Sources: Nolo.com LegalVision.com

Ed-Sheeran-Found-Not-Liable-affa-global

Ed Sheeran Found Not Liable for Plagiarizing Marvin Gaye

A federal jury in New York City found on Thursday that Ed Sheeran did not copy Marvin Gaye’s classic “Let’s Get It On” for his own 2014 hit “Thinking Out Loud.” The verdict came after a two-week trial in which Sheeran and his co-writers testified that they came up with the song independently. The lawsuit was filed by the heirs of Ed Townsend, who co-wrote “Let’s Get It On.” They argued that “Thinking Out Loud” copied the structure, melody, and rhythm of their song. However, the jury found that the similarities between the two songs were not substantial enough to constitute copyright infringement. The verdict is a victory for Sheeran, who has been one of the most successful pop stars in the world in recent years. It is also a setback for the heirs of Townsend, who had hoped to win a large settlement from Sheeran. The case was closely watched by the music industry, as it could have set a precedent for future copyright infringement cases. The verdict suggests that courts will be reluctant to find copyright infringement when there are only superficial similarities between two songs. This is not the first time that Sheeran has been accused of plagiarism. In 2017, he settled a lawsuit with the songwriters of the song “Amazing” by Matt Cardle. The songwriters alleged that Sheeran had copied the melody of their song for his own song “Photograph.” Sheeran has denied all allegations of plagiarism. He has said that he writes his songs from scratch and that he does not intentionally copy other artists’ work. The verdict in the Marvin Gaye case is a relief for Sheeran and his fans. It is also a victory for the music industry, as it sends a message that courts will not be quick to find copyright infringement in cases where there are only superficial similarities between two songs.   If you need further information about copyright recordation in Indonesia and other countries, please do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected]. Source: The Guardian

Katy-Perry-v-Katie-Perry-affa

Battle of Trademark: Katy Perry v Katie Perry Unfortunately, the singer lost in Australia.

In a trademark dispute, having a big name sometimes guarantees a win, but only sometimes. When Katy Perry, the owner of five Billboard Music Awards and a judge on American Idol with 108 million followers on Twitter, held concerts in Australia in 2014 and 2018, she sold a lot of fashion products through retail and social media using the trademark “Katy Perry,” which is owned by her company, Killer Queen, LLC. However, it turned out that there was already a similar trademark in Australia with a similar pronunciation, namely “Katie Perry” (with ie), which had been registered by a designer named Katie Taylor in the fashion category (Nice Class 25) since 2008. In 2009, Katy Perry’s lawyers actually tried to cancel Katie’s trademark and sent a “Cease and Desist Order” letter so she wouldn’t use the trademark again, but this effort was not pursued. After Katy Perry’s 2018 concert, which once again sold fashion products, Katie decided to strike back by reporting “Katy Perry” for ignoring the existence of “Katie Perry,” which has homophonous and had already been officially registered in IP Australia Finally, on Thursday, April 27, 2023, Australian Federal Court Judge Brigitte Markovic ruled that Killer Queen, LLC. had been proven to have infringed on some of Katie Taylor’s trademarks and ordered them to compensate for the damages with a certain amount that will be decided later. In response to this victory, Katie Taylor made a statement on her website, “Not only have I fought [for] myself, but I fought for small businesses in this country, many of them started by women, who can find themselves up against overseas entities who have much more financial power than we do. This victory could not have been achieved if Katie had not registered her trademark first. By registering a trademark, the owner obtains their rights, and the state provides legal protection so that the trademark’s economic rights are not violated. In Indonesia, a trademark can only be protected if an application for registration is filed first, and prior use of the trademark cannot be used as a basis for protection. This is because the ‘First to File’ approach is adopted by Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications.   If you need further information about trademark registration in Indonesia and other countries, please do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected]. Sources: Reuters.com Nine.com.au WIPO Global Brand Database

affa-ipr-website-artikel-USTR

Indonesia Remains on the USTR 301 Priority Watch List in 2023

As of 2023, Indonesia is still on the Priority Watch List due to the difficulties faced by U.S. right holders in obtaining adequate protection and enforcement of intellectual property (IP), as well as fair market access. According to the report, there is still rampant piracy and counterfeiting, with concerns persisting regarding the enforcement of IP rights. This includes insufficient penalties for infringement and ineffective border enforcement. Stakeholders have raised concerns about Indonesia’s Copyright Law and are pushing for revisions, while online piracy and unlicensed software usage remain problematic. The Directorate General for Customs and Excise, according to the report, has limited effectiveness due to a recordation system with only a few trademarks and copyrights, and foreign right holders face barriers in benefiting from the system. Additionally, there are concerns about Indonesia’s law on geographical indications and patent law, which raise questions about pre-existing trademark rights and patentability criteria, respectively. There is no effective system to protect against the unfair commercial use of undisclosed test or other data for marketing approval for pharmaceutical and agricultural chemical products. Market access barriers in Indonesia are also a concern, including regulations that limit foreign participation in the film sector. Although there has been some progress in addressing these issues, significant challenges remain. In 2022, Indonesia expanded its IP Enforcement Task Force to improve coordination on enforcement, but the United States encourages Indonesia to use the task force to enhance cooperation among relevant agencies and to pursue larger cases against criminal organizations involved in counterfeiting and piracy. Recently, Indonesia revoked the Omnibus Law on Job Creation, which had removed requirements for patents to be worked in Indonesia, and replaced it with new regulation. However, the United States, through the report, encourages Indonesia to undertake a more comprehensive amendment to the 2016 Patent Law and other legislation, and to provide affected stakeholders with meaningful input opportunities. Nevertheless, from the Indonesian perspective, we ought to see more changes and improvements, albeit at times they are incremental. Strong and robust laws and regulations will reassure the right holders, regardless of their nationalities, to invest more (as well as protecting their IP) in Indonesia. Source: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2023-04/2023%20Special%20301%20Report.pdf 

banner-website-artikel-china-affa-2023

在印度尼西亚申请商标的要求

AFFA可以协助我们的中国客户在印度尼西亚保护他们的商标。以下是要求: · 授权书(简单签署 – 不需要公证/认证)»附加 · 商标所有人声明(简单签署 – 不需要公证/认证)»附加 · 商标样本(最好是Jpeg格式) · 如果申请提出优先权,则需要优先权文件的认证副本及其英文翻译 商品和服务 请注意,申请人应参考马德里商品和服务经理,以了解可接受的商品和服务。非标准项目将无法包含在申请表中。 证书 最近提交的申请将以电子格式发放证书。 请注意,从提交到商标证书发放可能需要大约12-14个月。阶段如下: 提交 形式审查(15天) 发布(2个月) 审查 注册号发放 商标证书发放 请联系 [email protected]; [email protected] 获取进一步协助。微信 AFFAIPR.

Highest-IP-Filings

Indonesia Listed as One of the Countries with the Highest IP Filings in the World

Indonesia has made its way to be recognised among the top 10 countries in the world with the most Trademark filings. According to WIPO’s report in 2022, Indonesia recorded 127,142 Trademark filings – the number is higher than Vietnam (113,079), Argentina (85,844), the Philippines (64,946), and South Africa (39,863). This accomplishment is also complemented with a statistic which shows Indonesia as one of the countries with the highest number of Simple Patent filing with a total number of 3,249 applications. However, this number is significantly lower than China (2,852,219), Germany (10,576), Japan  (5,238), and just below Thailand by a slight margin (3,762). This achievement is made possible by the continuous digital improvement strategized and implemented by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of the Republic of Indonesia (DGIP).  The DGIP also has other notable improvements that are worth mentioning, such as the automatic Trademark renewal certificate issuance, automatic Copyright recordation certificate issuance, automatic license notification issuance, and automatic Trademark registration excerpt issuance. These improvements are hoped to be in full operation from 2023 and we certainly hope these improvements will be extended to other important features of IP filings in Indonesia. For more information about how you can protect your IP in Indonesia, please contact us at [email protected].

Top-Ways-to-Accelerate-Your-Patent-Application

3 Top Ways to Accelerate Your Patent Application in Indonesia

The Directorate General of Intellectual Property of the Republic of Indonesia under the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as “DGIP”) has established various procedures under which the examination of a patent application may be accelerated. Under these procedures, DGIP will advance an application out of turn for faster examination if the applicant files the following special requests through the ASPEC program, Indonesia-Japan PPH program, or simply by providing the examiner in charge the granted corresponding claims from other Patent Offices, such as the USPTO, JPO, EPO, and others. We herewith summarize the options that may suit your need, depending on where you file your patent applications in other jurisdictions: 1. ASPEC The ASEAN Patent Examination Co-operation ( hereinafter referred to as “ASPEC”) was launched on 15 June 2009 and it is the first regional patent work-sharing program which involves nine participating ASEAN Member States (AMS) IP Offices of Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Viet Nam. The program aims to accelerate the patent examination process by encouraging each of the participating Patent Offices to share search and examination results to allow applicants in the participating countries to obtain corresponding patents faster and more efficiently. Since ASPEC aims to reduce duplication on the search and examination work done, it is hoped that the search and examination work done on a corresponding application can be used as a useful reference in producing high-quality examination reports. Hence, if you can obtain the examination result from other countries in the participating Patent Offices, then the examination results or reports can be used as the basis of examination acceleration, as long as the corresponding claims are the same. When requesting ASPEC, the patent applicant is required to submit an ASPEC Request Form in the second Patent Office. The ASPEC Request Form shall be accompanied by the following documents: 1. a copy of the Search and Examination (S&E) report or the Examination report (“minimum documents”) of a corresponding application from the first IP Office; and 2. a copy of the claims referred to in the minimum documents submitted, with at least one claim determined by the first IP Office to be allowable/patentable. For PCT ASPEC request, the patent applicant is required to indicate that the request is for PCT ASPEC in the ASPEC form. The completed ASPEC request form shall be submitted together with the following documents: 1. a copy of the written opinion/international preliminary examination report (“WO/ISA, WO/IPEA or IPER”) established by an ASEAN International Searching Authority/International Preliminary Examining Authority (ASEAN ISA/IPEA) (“minimum documents”) relating to a corresponding application from the first IP Office; and 2. a copy of the claims referred to in the minimum documents submitted, with at least one claim determined by the first IP Office to be allowable/patentable. Please be mindful that the request to utilize ASPEC can only be done after the application has finished the publication stage. Based on our experience, the time it takes from filing the ASPEC request until the issuance of the decision to grant will not be more than 12 months – a great improvement in lead or pendency times compared to the processing time for non-ASPEC (or PPH) patent applications in Indonesia.   2. Japan-Indonesia Patent Prosecution Highway (Indonesia-Japan PPH) The Japan Patent Office (hereinafter referred to as the “JPO”) and the DGIP have initiated a Patent Prosecution Highway Program (hereinafter referred to as the “PPH”) back on June 1, 2013, and since then, the PPH has been chosen by many applicants who have previously filed their base applications in Japan as the method of accelerating the patent applications in Indonesia. The PPH request can be filed at any time as long as it is before the deadline to request the substantive examination stage. Please also be mindful that there will be an official fee of Rp 5.000.000,00 incurred for requesting the PPH acceleration program. When it comes to the requirements, the DGIP will require the applicant to provide the following documents in order to start the accelerate examination process: All formality documents required to file the application have been submitted and the DGIP will issue the notice of formality documents completion, which should also be provided by the applicant; Proof of payment to file a substantive examination request; The application should have passed the Publication of Period of 6 months; PPH Form (filled in); Corresponding claims which should be equivalent or less compared to the claims granted by the JPO; OEE ad OLE examination results; and OEE/OLE in English and/or in Bahasa Indonesia. Based on our experience, the time it takes from filing the ASPEC request until the issuance of the decision to grant will not be more than 7 to 12 months – a great improvement in lead or pendency times compared to the processing time for non-ASPEC (or PPH) patent applications in Indonesia.   3. Providing Corresponding Registered Claims In case none of the options above apply to you, you mal also provide the examiners at the DGIP with the corresponding granted claims from other well-established Patent Offices, such as the USPTO, UKIP, EP, AUIPO, SIPO, JPO, etc. The provision of the corresponding granted claims from the aforementioned Patent Offices will make it easier for the examiners at the DGIP to expedite the examination. Please note that the documents should be provided with the equivalent English translation. For any questions related to patent application in Indonesia, please do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected].