Mandatory Patent Implementation Annual Reporting in Indonesia Is in Force - AFFA IPR

Mandatory Patent Implementation Annual Reporting in Indonesia Is in Force

In accordance to Article 20A of Law No. 65 Year 2024, a Patent Holder is obliged to file an annual Patent implementation report to the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) under the Ministry of Law before the annuity payment deadline. Be mindful that failure to implement a registered Patent in Indonesia may lead to the Patent Registration being subject to compulsory licensing and/or potential  Patent Invalidation, which can be filed before the Court of Commerce.   Under the Indonesian practice, what constitutes as a Patent implementation/use are as follows: Product is manufactured/process is used and commercialized; Product is manufactured/process is used but not yet commercialized; Importation of patented product/process; or Licensing of patented product/process.   While the implementing regulation for this specific matter has yet to be issued, the DGIP officers have urged the Patent holders to file the annual implementation report no later than the end of each year. Should you need more information about the annual Patent implementation report in Indonesia, feel free to contact us at [email protected].

6 Key Principles of Patent Protection in Indonesia - AFFA IPR

6 Key Principles of Patent Protection in Indonesia

Through Law Number 65 of 2024 on Patents, the Indonesian Government has revised the definition of “invention” to mean an inventor’s idea manifested in solving a specific problem in the field of technology, which can take the form of a product or process, or the improvement and development of an existing product or process.   Meanwhile, a Patent is an exclusive right granted by the state to an inventor for an invention that meets the criteria of patentability, namely novelty (new), inventive step, and industrial applicability. For Utility Models, the requirements include at least novelty, incremental improvements to existing products or processes, practical utility, and industrial applicability.   If you are an inventor, a Patent will protect your invention by granting you legal rights, enabling you to enjoy the economic benefits of your invention.   However, six key principles form the foundation of Patent protection and are crucial for safeguarding technological innovations and inventions. These principles are:   First-to-File: This principle states that the first party to file a Patent application is granted Patent rights, not the first to invent or use it. Therefore, Patent owners must file their applications as soon as possible. Patent Information: Every Patent application must include complete information about the invention, such as descriptions, claims, and drawings illustrating how the invention works. This information will be published once the application is approved, allowing the public to refer to it and encouraging further technological advancements. Protection Is Granted Only by Application: Patents are only granted if the inventor or an authorized party submits an official application. Without an application, Patent rights will not be awarded, even if the invention meets patentability requirements. Obligation to Pay Annual Fees: After a Patent is granted, the Patent holder must pay annual fees to maintain the Patent rights. Failure to pay these fees can result in the cancellation of the Patent, making the invention part of the public domain. Universal Substantive Examination: Every Patent application undergoes a substantive examination to ensure the invention meets the requirements of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. This process ensures that only truly innovative inventions are granted Patent protection. Territorial Protection: Patent rights are territorial, meaning protection is only valid in the country or region where the Patent is registered and approved. To secure protection in other countries, the inventor must file separate Patent applications in those countries.   By understanding these six principles, innovators and industry players can take the necessary steps to legally protect their inventions and maximize their economic potential.   You might also want to read: Indonesia’s Patent Law Amendment: Excluded Inventions and Change in Novelty Grace Period Should you need more information about Patent protection in Indonesia or globally, feel free to contact us at [email protected].

Amended Definition of Patent under the Revised Indonesian Patent Law - AFFA IPR

Amended Definition of Patent under the Revised Indonesian Patent Law

The landscape of Intellectual Property in Indonesia continues to evolve, reflecting the dynamic nature of technology and innovation. One of the most significant updates in Law No. 65 of 2024, which is the third amendment to Law No. 13 of 2016 on Patents, lies in the revised definition of “Invention.”   The Old Definition Under Law No. 13 of 2016, Article 1(2) defined an invention as: “An idea of an inventor embodied into a specific problem-solving activity in the field of technology in the form of product or process, or refining and developing product or process.”   While this definition provided a foundation for Patent protection, it was deemed limited in addressing the broader advancements in technology and innovation across various industries.   The New Definition With the enactment of Law No. 65 of 2024, Article 1(2) now defines an invention as: “An idea of an inventor embodied into a specific problem-solving activity in the field of technology in the form of product and/or process, refinement, and/or development of a product and/or process, as well as systems, methods, and uses.”   Key Changes and Implications   Broader Scope: The inclusion of “systems, methods, and uses” significantly broadens the scope of what can be patented. This change acknowledges the importance of protecting technological advancements that may not fit neatly into the previous categories of “product or process.” Clarity and Flexibility: By adding “and/or” between product, process, refinement, and development, the law ensures greater flexibility in interpretation, making it more inclusive for different types of innovations. Alignment with Global Standards: The new definition aligns more closely with international Patent laws, making Indonesia a more attractive jurisdiction for inventors and businesses seeking to protect their Intellectual Property globally.   Why the Change Matters   This amendment reflects Indonesia’s commitment to adapting its Intellectual Property framework to keep pace with the rapid evolution of technology. From AI-driven systems to innovative methods in healthcare, the revised definition ensures that inventors in Indonesia have a robust legal foundation to protect and commercialize their ideas.   The revision is not only a response to domestic technological advancements but also a move to foster innovation and competitiveness in the international market. By expanding the definition, Indonesia signals its readiness to embrace emerging industries and future innovations.   For a deeper dive into the broader implications of the revised Patent Law, read our comprehensive guide: The Ultimate Guide to the Amendment of the Indonesian Patent Law. Should you need to know how this new definition impacts your business or invention, feel free to contact us at [email protected].

[URGENT UPDATE] Key Changes to the Indonesian Patent and Trademark Laws after the Enactment of the Law No. 11 Year 2020 on Job Creations

The Law No. 11 Year 2020 on Job Creations (hereinafter referred to as “the Omnibus Law”) was finally signed by the President of the Republic of Indonesia, Joko Widodo, on November 2, 2020. The Omnibus Law is 1,187 pages long and it consists of numerous revisions to the existing laws that are aimed to spur job creations in Indonesia. While it puts a stronger emphasis on the Employment Law, the Omnibus Law – after several amendments – also impacted key provisions in the Law No. 13 Year 2016 on Patents (hereinafter referred to as “the Patent Law”) and the Law No. 20 Year 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications (hereinafter referred to as “the Trademark Law”). We herewith list the changes and revisions for your perusal: Changes to the Patent Law Simple Patent Article 3 of the Patent law has been revised to the following: (1) A Patent is granted for a novel invention, which has inventive steps and can be applied industrially. (2) Whereas a Simple Patent for a novel invention, which is the development of a product or a process that already exists and can be applied industrially. (3) The development of an existing product or process can cover: Simple products: Simple processes; or Simple methods. In addition, Article 122 of the Patent Law also regulates the following requirements regarding the Substantive Examination Request for a Simple Patent: (1) A Simple Patent is only granted for one Invention. (2) The Request for the Substantive Examination for a Simple Patent shall be done at the same time as the time of the filing of the application with official fees. (3) If the Substantive Examination Request is not filed at the time of filing of the Simple Patent application or if the Official Fees are not paid, then the Simple Patent application is considered withdrawn. Whereas Article 123 of the Patent Law which regulates the publication period is amended as under: (1) The publication of a Simple Patent shall be done no later than 14 days from the date of filing of the Simple Patent Application. (2) The publication as referred to (1) shall be done for 14 working days. (3) The Substantive Examination is conducted after the publication has ended. (4) Except for the provisions in Article 48 Para (3) and (4), an opposition against a Simple Patent application is used as a determining factor during the Substantive Examination Stage. Article 124 of the Patent Law is also amended so that the Substantive Examination period is cut by half: (1) The Minister shall issue a decision to grant/reject a Simple Patent no later than 6 months from the date of the application date of the Simple Patent. (2) A Simple Patent which is granted by the Minister shall be recorded and published via electronic or non-electronic media. (3) The Minister issues a Simple Patent certificate to the Patent Owner as the proof of ownership. Use Requirements in Indonesia remain in place despite the initial plan and proposal to scrap it altogether The initial plan to scrap Article 20 of the Patent Law was scrapped at the very last minute. Nevertheless, the Use Requirements have become “more accommodating” since it lists importation and licensing as the definition of use. Article 20 has been reworded as under: (1) A Patent shall be used/performed in Indonesia. (2) The patent performance as referred to in (1) is as under: The use/performance of a Patented product by manufacturing, importing, or licensing the patented product; The use/performance of a Patented process by manufacturing, importing, or licensing the product which has been resulted from a patented process; or The use/performance of a Patented method, system, and use by manufacturing, importing or licensing a product which has been resulted from a method, system, and use which has been patented. Changes to the Compulsory-Licensing Article 82 which regulates Compulsory-Licensing has been reworded as under: (1) A Compulsory-License is a License to use/perform a Patent which has been granted by a Ministerial Decree or based on a request under the following conditions: A Patent has not been used/performed in Indonesia as per Article 20 for 36 months after it was granted; A Patent which has been used/performed by a Patent Holder or by the Licensee in a way that is detrimental to the public interest or A Patent resulting from the development of the existing Patents granted earlier could not be implemented without using the other party’s Patents which are still under protection. (2) The Compulsory-License request will be subject to the payment of official fees. Changes to the Trademark Law Some provisions in the Trademark Law have also been revised in the Omnibus Law. The most notable changes are as under: Functional 3D Mark is no longer registrable in Indonesia According to the revised Article 20 of the Trademark Law, a Mark cannot be registered if: It is contrary to the state ideology, prevailing laws, and regulations, religious values, decency, or public order: It is the same, related to, or simply states the goods and/or services covered in the application; It contains a misleading element concerning the origin, quality, type, size, option, the purpose of use of the goods and/or services covered in the application or if the application is a name of a plant variety that is registered for the same goods and/or services; It contains inaccurate information regarding the quality, benefit, or efficacy of the goods and/or services that are produced; It lacks distinguishing elements; It is a common name and/or public symbol; and/or It contains a shape that is functional. Shorter Substantive Examination period Article 23 of the Trademark Law circumvents the Substantive Examination period from 150 working days to 30 days if there is no opposition or 90 days if there is an opposition. The amended provision is as under: (1) A Substantive Examination is an examination that is conducted by an Examiner for every Trademark Application. (2) All oppositions and/or objections are considered in the Substantive Examination. (3) If there is no opposition filed…