Blindboxes, Resellers, and IP: When Does Selling Cross the Line? - AFFA IPR

Blindboxes, Resellers, and IP: When Does Selling Cross the Line?

Action figure communities in Indonesia have recently been shaken by a wave of takedowns on popular products across e-commerce platforms. Not only unofficial sellers like casual collectors were affected, but even official resellers who had followed the “white list” registration procedures were hit. The trigger? An official notice from the Trademark Holder (a licensed distributor of the Trademark Owner) prohibits various uses of the brand name and logo and the sale of unboxed items.   This incident raises an important question among many collectors and business owners: Can Intellectual Property (IP) Holders arbitrarily ban secondhand sales? Is this legal?   The Exclusive Rights of Trademark Holders   Legally, a Trademark Holder has the exclusive right to control how their mark/name/logo is used, especially in marketing and product distribution. However, it’s important to note:   IP law does not automatically prohibit the resale of secondhand products, as long as the items are genuine and were lawfully acquired. Under a principle known as the “exhaustion doctrine”, the rights of a Trademark Holder are considered “exhausted” once the product is sold lawfully for the first time. This means the buyer may resell it. However, the Trademark Holder does retain the right to restrict the use of their brand in contexts such as store branding, product repackaging, or unauthorized logo usage that may mislead consumers or harm brand image.   In short, banning the resale of secondhand goods just because they are used can be legally disputed. But banning the unauthorized commercial use of logos, names, and other brand elements is legally valid.   Safe Tips for Selling Secondhand Items Without Violating IP Rights   To avoid infringing a brand’s rights when selling collectibles or secondhand products, here are some best practices:   Avoid using the brand name or logo in your store title. Use neutral descriptions like “blindbox collectible” or “random rare figure.” Clarify that the product is from a personal collection and is pre-owned. This can help show there’s no intention to violate distribution rights. Do not modify or rebrand the product. Repackaging or adding custom branding (like stickers) can be considered infringement. Avoid implying that you’re an official distributor. If you’re not part of the authorized distribution channel, avoid using terms like “official” or “authorized.” Do not sell opened blindbox items if the Trademark Holder prohibits it. If a product is meant to be a surprise item, unboxing and selling it by character name can be considered a violation of its commercial value.   But Why Can People Freely Sell Used iPhones?   This comparison has sparked debate. After all, people sell secondhand iPhones on online platforms all the time without issue. What’s the difference?   Apple and other phone manufacturers do not prohibit the sale of secondhand devices as long as they are genuine and unmodified. iPhones are not designed as “surprise” collectibles like blindboxes, so there’s no concern about damaged exclusivity due to unboxing. Sellers of secondhand iPhones also do not claim to be official distributors and don’t use Apple’s logo for store branding.   In essence, the issue is not the fact that the item is secondhand, but the context of branding and marketing.   Selling secondhand goods is legally allowed, as long as the products are genuine and the seller does not mislead consumers by misusing brand elements. For collectors and small sellers, understanding the limits of IP law is key to keeping your listings safe from takedowns or legal claims.   Should you need expert advice on Trademark usage in online sales, contact us at [email protected].

Fighting IP Crimes: Indonesia's IP Office Task Force Destroys IDR 5.35 Billion Worth of Counterfeit Goods! - AFFA IPR

Fighting IP Crimes: Indonesia’s IP Office Task Force Destroys IDR 5.35 Billion Worth of Counterfeit Goods!

The Indonesian Intellectual Property (IP) Task Force, a cross-ministerial special task force of the Republic of Indonesia, consists of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP), the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE), the National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM), the Ministry of Communication and Digital (Komdigi), the Criminal Investigation Department (Bareskrim) of the National Police, and the National Cyber and Crypto Agency (BSSN). On December 12, 2024, the task force symbolically destroyed a number of products associated with violations of 12 Trademarks and Industrial Designs.   During a press conference, the Director General of Intellectual Property, Razilu, stated: “This destruction serves as a strong message from the DGIP that there is no room for Intellectual Property violations in Indonesia.”   At least three key messages were conveyed through the destruction of these products: Deterrence: To provide a deterrent effect on offenders, ensuring they refrain from committing further violations. Both civil and criminal legal actions can be enforced against them. Creator and Owner Protection: To assure creators and IP owners that their works are protected, fostering an environment where they can continue innovating. Public Awareness: To urge the public never to buy counterfeit or fake goods at low prices, as these products can adversely affect health, employment, and the environment.   The destroyed products, valued at IDR 5.35 billion, included the following: LEGO (toys): Worth over IDR 1 billion, from 110 items. Comotomo (baby bottles): Worth over IDR 500 million, from 888 items. Mimi White (hand and body lotion): 216 items. MT NG Shan (drill bits): 2,000 pieces. Louis Vuitton (women’s bags, wallets, and belts): 10 items. Christian Louboutin (women’s shoes): 2 pairs. Tokai (lighters): 5 boxes. Orion Choco Pie (snack/biscuits): 50 boxes. Honda (spare parts): 30 boxes. Honda (generators): 30 units. Harley Davidson (apparel accessories, umbrellas, and wallets): 600 items. Food Packaging (Industrial Design): 30 boxes.   It is important to note that the products classified as IP violations are not limited to counterfeit goods but also include goods illegally entering the Indonesian market. Under the law, smuggled goods that bypass official channels, fail to adhere to applicable import procedures, and are subject to objections by the official license holders of the relevant trademarks are subject to enforcement actions.   Given the complex and extensive scope of IP  violations, cross-sector enforcement is required. The specific roles of the involved institutions are as follows: DGIP: Monitoring, supervision, preventive measures, mitigation strategies, and enforcement of IP laws. DGCE: Addressing the importation of goods suspected of infringing IP rights. BPOM: Managing the distribution of food and pharmaceutical products that are suspected of infringing IP rights and endangering public health and the environment. Komdigi: Handling complaints and requests for blocking websites related to goods and/or services deemed to violate IP rights. Bareskrim Polri: Coordinating communication and collaboration for law enforcement from the central office to its units across Indonesia. BSSN: Monitoring IP violations in cyberspace and assisting in handling IP infringements that occur in the digital realm.   You might also want to read: Unraveling the Global Complexity of IP Crime: Money Laundering and More!   Each year, the average number of reports on IP violations is around 50 cases, with the majority involving Trademark, Industrial Design, and Copyright infringements. The active role of Komdigi has also significantly contributed to blocking 414 websites infringing Copyrights based on 16 requests. However, considering that the IDR 5 billion in damages mentioned earlier came from only 12 cases, this can be seen as just the beginning or the tip of the iceberg in the enforcement of IP laws in Indonesia.   Therefore, the participation of the five key components of the nation—Government, Academics, Private Sector, Society, and Media—is expected to continue supporting efforts to create a better Intellectual Property climate in Indonesia.   With increasing public awareness of the importance of Intellectual Property, there will also be positive impacts on the national economy and Indonesia’s investment climate in the global arena.   Should you need more information regarding Trademark protection and other Intellectual Property matters in Indonesia and abroad, feel free to contact us via email at [email protected].