{"id":4728,"date":"2024-04-02T10:20:26","date_gmt":"2024-04-02T10:20:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/?p=4728"},"modified":"2024-12-06T11:53:29","modified_gmt":"2024-12-06T11:53:29","slug":"important-update-japan-adopts-letter-of-consent-for-trademark-registration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/2024\/04\/02\/important-update-japan-adopts-letter-of-consent-for-trademark-registration\/","title":{"rendered":"[Important Update] Japan Adopts Letter of Consent for Trademark Registration"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The revised Japan Trademark Law will come into effect on April 1, 2024, introducing the \u201cLetter of Consent\u201d to overcome conflicts with earlier Trademark registrations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">However, the <\/span><b>Japan Patent Office (JPO)<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> recently announced that evidence must be provided in addition to a consent letter obtained from the earlier registrant when applying Article 4(4) of the Japan Trademark Law. This evidence must convince the JPO examiner that there is no likelihood of confusion between earlier and junior marks, not only at present but also in the future.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Article 4(4) of the Japan Trademark Law, which is newly introduced in April, states:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trademark applications will not be rejected under Article 4(1)(xi) as long as the applicant obtains consent from the owner of the cited mark and it is unlikely to cause confusion with the cited owner or its exclusive or non-exclusive licensee when used on goods or services designated under the application.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Trademark Examination Guidelines for Article 4(4) Provides:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The requirement of being \u2018unlikely to cause confusion\u2019 must be satisfied at the time of the JPO examiner\u2019s decision and in the future.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">To satisfy the requirement, the following factors will be assessed:<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Similarity between marks<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Recognition of mark<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Uniqueness of mark<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Significance of mark (House mark or product brand)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Possibility of business expansion<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Relatedness of goods and service<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Consumers<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trade practices involving actual use of mark<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Where both marks are identical and used on same goods and service, the examiner will find \u201clikely to cause confusion\u201d in principle.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Applicant must provide evidence to demonstrate the unlikelihood of confusion based on the actual use of both marks. For example:<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Different color, font or combination between literal element and figurative element of respective mark<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Different position to place the mark or to accompany with other distinctive mark<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Difference in speific purpose or price of respective goods<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Different sales channel<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Different seasons to use the mark<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Different territory to use the mark<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mutual covenants to take necessary actions if confusion is likely to occur between the marks\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">An agreement between the parties to keep the present use or configuration of both marks in the future will be required to strengthen the unlikelihood of confusion in the future.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none\"><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none\"><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It is important to note that \u201cLetter of Consent\u201d is not available to Trademark applications filed with the JPO before April 1, 2024, even if they are pending examination.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Similarly, international registrations registered at the <\/span><b>World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> or subsequently designated to Japan before April 1, 2024, can\u2019t use the consent.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Should you need further information regarding Trademark registration in Japan or other countries, please email us at <a href=\"mailto:emirsyah.dinar@affa.co.id\">emirsyah.dinar@affa.co.id<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The revised Japan Trademark Law will come into effect on April 1, 2024, introducing the \u201cLetter of Consent\u201d to overcome conflicts with earlier Trademark registrations. &nbsp; However, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) recently announced that evidence must be provided in addition to a consent letter obtained from the earlier registrant when applying Article 4(4) of the Japan Trademark Law. This evidence must convince the JPO examiner that there is no likelihood of confusion between earlier and junior marks, not only at present but also in the future. &nbsp; Article 4(4) of the Japan Trademark Law, which is newly introduced in April, states: &nbsp; Trademark applications will not be rejected under Article 4(1)(xi) as long as the applicant obtains consent from the owner of the cited mark and it is unlikely to cause confusion with the cited owner or its exclusive or non-exclusive licensee when used on goods or services designated under the application. &nbsp; Trademark Examination Guidelines for Article 4(4) Provides: &nbsp; The requirement of being \u2018unlikely to cause confusion\u2019 must be satisfied at the time of the JPO examiner\u2019s decision and in the future. To satisfy the requirement, the following factors will be assessed: Similarity between marks Recognition of mark Uniqueness of mark Significance of mark (House mark or product brand) Possibility of business expansion Relatedness of goods and service Consumers Trade practices involving actual use of mark Where both marks are identical and used on same goods and service, the examiner will find \u201clikely to cause confusion\u201d in principle. Applicant must provide evidence to demonstrate the unlikelihood of confusion based on the actual use of both marks. For example: Different color, font or combination between literal element and figurative element of respective mark Different position to place the mark or to accompany with other distinctive mark Difference in speific purpose or price of respective goods Different sales channel Different seasons to use the mark Different territory to use the mark Mutual covenants to take necessary actions if confusion is likely to occur between the marks An agreement between the parties to keep the present use or configuration of both marks in the future will be required to strengthen the unlikelihood of confusion in the future. &nbsp; It is important to note that \u201cLetter of Consent\u201d is not available to Trademark applications filed with the JPO before April 1, 2024, even if they are pending examination. &nbsp; Similarly, international registrations registered at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) or subsequently designated to Japan before April 1, 2024, can\u2019t use the consent. Should you need further information regarding Trademark registration in Japan or other countries, please email us at emirsyah.dinar@affa.co.id.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":4727,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[102],"tags":[35,43,48,68,75,87,182,183,184,185,186],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4728"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4728"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4730,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4728\/revisions\/4730"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4727"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}