{"id":4372,"date":"2023-10-08T10:08:28","date_gmt":"2023-10-08T10:08:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/?p=4372"},"modified":"2023-10-08T10:09:40","modified_gmt":"2023-10-08T10:09:40","slug":"switzerland-maintains-its-innovation-leadership-in-2023-indonesia-secures-61st-position","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/2023\/10\/08\/switzerland-maintains-its-innovation-leadership-in-2023-indonesia-secures-61st-position\/","title":{"rendered":"Switzerland Maintains Its Innovation Leadership in 2023; Indonesia Secures 61st Position"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4><b>Switzerland Maintains Its Innovation Leadership in 2023; Indonesia Secures 61st Position<\/b><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Global Innovation Index (GII) 2023 has been released, and it reveals that global innovation is on the rise, with the average GII score reaching an all-time high of 35.9. Switzerland leads with 67.6 points and Angola is in last place, 132nd, with only 10.3.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">The GII ranks 132 countries based on their seven innovation performance categories, further divided into several criteria to generate these points. The details are as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>1. Institutions<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">a. Institutional Environment<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Operational Stability for Businesses<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Government Effectiveness<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">b. Regulatory Environment<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Regulatory Quality<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Rule of Law<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Cost of Redundancy Dismissal<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">c. Business Environment<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Policies for Doing Business<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Entrepreneurship Policies and Culture<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>2. Human Capital &amp; Research<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">a. Education<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Expenditure on Education<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Government Funding per Student<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. School Life Expectancy<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. PISA Scales in Reading, Maths, and Science<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">v. Student-Teacher Ratio<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">b. Tertiary Education<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Tertiary Environment<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Graduates in Science and Engineering<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Tertiary Inbound Mobility<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">c. Research and Development (R&amp;D)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Researchers<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Gross Expenditure on R&amp;D<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Global Corporate R&amp;D Investors<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) University Ranking<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>3. Infrastructure<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">a. Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. ICT Access<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. ICT Use<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Government Online Service<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. E-Participation<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">b. General Infrastructure<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Electricity Output<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Logistic Performance<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Gross Capital Information<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">c. Ecological Sustainability<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. GDP per Unit of Energy Use<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Environmental Performance<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. ISO 14001 Environment<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>4. Market Sophistication<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">a. Credit<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Finance for Startups and Scaleups<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Domestic Credit to Private Sector<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Loans from Microfinance Institutions<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">b. Investment<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Market Capitalization<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Venture Capital (VC) Investors<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. VC Recipients<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. VC Received<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">c. Trade, Diversification, and Market Scale<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Applied Tariff Rate<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Domestic Industry Diversification<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Domestic Market Scale<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>5. Business Sophistication<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">a. Knowledge Workers<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Knowledge-Intensive Employment<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Firms Offering Formal Training<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. GERD Performed by Business<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. GERD Financed by Business<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">v. Females Employed with Advanced Degrees<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">b. Innovation Linkages<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. University-Industry R&amp;D Collaboration<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. State of Cluster Development<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. GERD Financed by Abroad<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. Joint Venture\/ Strategic Alliance<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">v. Patent Families<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">c. Knowledge Absorption<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Intellectual Property Payments<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. High-Tech Imports<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. ICT Services Imports<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. FDI Net Inflows<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">v. Research Talent<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>6. Knowledge &amp; Technology Outputs\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">a. Knowledge Creation<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Patents by Origin<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. PCT Patents by Origin<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Utility Models by Origin<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. Scientist and Technical Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">v. Citable Documents H-Index<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">b. Knowledge Impact<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Labor Productivity Growth<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Unicorn Valuation<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Software Spending<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. High-Tech Manufacturing<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">c. Knowledge Diffusion<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Intellectual Property Receipts<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Production and Export Complexity<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. High-Tech Exports<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. ICT Services Exports<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">v. ISO 9001 Quality<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>7. Creative Outputs\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">a. Intangible Assets<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Intangible Asset Intensity<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Trademarks by Origin<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Global Brand Value<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. Industrial Design by Origin<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">b. Creative Goods and Services<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Cultural and Creative Services Exports<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. National Feature Films<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. Entertainment and Media Market<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. Creative Goods Exports<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">c. Online Creativity<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">i. Generic Top-Level Domains<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">ii. Country-Code Top-Level Domains<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iii. GitHub Commits<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">iv. Mobile App Creation<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">Switzerland tops the GII rankings for the 13th year in a row, followed by Sweden, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. The top 10 economies are all high-income countries. Still, several middle-income countries are also performing well in innovation, such as Indonesia joining China, T\u00fcrkiye, India, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and Vietnam as the most impressive innovation climbers of the last decade.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_4374\" style=\"width: 877px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4374\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-4374 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"867\" height=\"414\" srcset=\"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-1.jpg 867w, https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-1-300x143.jpg 300w, https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-1-768x367.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 867px) 100vw, 867px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-4374\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: WIPO Global Innovation Index 2023<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">For the 13th consecutive year, Switzerland ranks first in the GII. It is the global leader in innovation outputs, ranking first in both Knowledge and technology outputs and Creative outputs. Sweden overtakes the United States (US) to climb to second position. Sweden leads in Business sophistication (1st), Infrastructure (2nd), and Human capital and research (3rd). It holds top positions for its Researchers (1st) and Knowledge-intensive employment (3rd). The United States continues to head the league table of scoring best in the world in 13 of the 80 GII 2023 innovation indicators. It is number one in the world in indicators that include Global corporate R&amp;D investors, Venture capital received, the quality of its universities, the combined valuation of its unicorn companies (a new GII indicator), software spending, and the value of corporate Intangible asset intensity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">Singapore enters the top five leading in South East Asia, East Asia, and Oceania (SEAO) region economies. Finland (6th) gets closer to the top five, gaining three ranks this year. It comes top worldwide in Infrastructure (1st).<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">Denmark (9th) and the Republic of Korea (10th) remain in the top 10. France (11th) gets closer, improving one rank this year, while Japan remains strong as the 13th most innovative economy. Israel re-enters the top 15, reaching 14th place.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_4375\" style=\"width: 878px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4375\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-4375 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"868\" height=\"411\" srcset=\"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-2.jpg 868w, https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-2-300x142.jpg 300w, https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-2-768x364.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 868px) 100vw, 868px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-4375\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: WIPO Global Innovation Index 2023<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">After a rapid ascent, gaining 23 positions over the last decade, China ranks 12th this year, dropping one rank relative to 2022. China remains the sole middle-income economy to secure a position among the top 30, retaining 3rd place in the SEAO region and top spot in the upper middle-income group. Apart from China, there are only four other middle-income economies among the top 40 economies, namely, Malaysia (36th), Bulgaria (38th), T\u00fcrkiye (39th) and India (40th).<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h4><b>Standout Countries\u2019 4-year Innovation Surge, 2019\u20132023<\/b><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">In the last four years, and since the pandemic, Saudi Arabia (48th), Brazil (49th), Mauritius (57th), Indonesia (61st), and Pakistan (88th) ascended most in the GII, in order of their rank progression.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_4376\" style=\"width: 873px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4376\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-4376 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-3.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"863\" height=\"184\" srcset=\"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-3.jpg 863w, https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-3-300x64.jpg 300w, https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-3-768x164.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 863px) 100vw, 863px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-4376\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: WIPO Global Innovation Index 2023<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">In 2019, Indonesia was ranked 85th with 29.7 points. In 2020, although the points decreased to 26.5, the ranking remained at number 85. The increase was only one point in the following years (2021-2022), but it was enough to increase the ranking to the top 75. Of course, The peak this year is 61st place with 31.3 points.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">Indonesia makes marked improvements in innovation outputs, notably in Knowledge Creation and Online Creativity. It excels in ICT-related indicators and ranks among the top 10 globally for University\u2013Industry R&amp;D Collaboration (5th), State of Cluster Development (5th), Entrepreneurship Policies and Culture (5th), and Finance for Startups and Scaleups (8th). However, for Human Capital Research, Indonesia is still very low in the Education (113th) and Tertiary Education (95th) categories.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_4377\" style=\"width: 1821px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4377\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-4377 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-4-scaled-e1696759615785.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1811\" height=\"2022\" srcset=\"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-4-scaled-e1696759615785.jpg 1811w, https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-4-scaled-e1696759615785-269x300.jpg 269w, https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-4-scaled-e1696759615785-917x1024.jpg 917w, https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-4-scaled-e1696759615785-768x857.jpg 768w, https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2023\/10\/img-4-scaled-e1696759615785-1376x1536.jpg 1376w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1811px) 100vw, 1811px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-4377\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: WIPO Global Innovation Index 2023<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">Of the 80 GII determining points, 12, or around 15%, are closely related to Intellectual Property. Therefore, every effort to increase education, protection, and law enforcement regarding IP must be supported to raise Indonesia&#8217;s ranking on the Global Innovation Index.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>If you need further information regarding the protection and enforcement of laws related to Intellectual Property, do not hesitate to contact us via <a href=\"mailto:affa@cbn.net.id\">affa@cbn.net.id<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"hr-thin\"><\/div>\n<p><strong>Source:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 500;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wipo.int\/global_innovation_index\/en\/2023\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 500;\">WIPO Global Innovation Index 2023<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Switzerland Maintains Its Innovation Leadership in 2023; Indonesia Secures 61st Position The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Global Innovation Index (GII) 2023 has been released, and it reveals that global innovation is on the rise, with the average GII score reaching an all-time high of 35.9. Switzerland leads with 67.6 points and Angola is in last place, 132nd, with only 10.3. &nbsp; The GII ranks 132 countries based on their seven innovation performance categories, further divided into several criteria to generate these points. The details are as follows: 1. Institutions a. Institutional Environment i. Operational Stability for Businesses ii. Government Effectiveness b. Regulatory Environment i. Regulatory Quality ii. Rule of Law iii. Cost of Redundancy Dismissal c. Business Environment i. Policies for Doing Business ii. Entrepreneurship Policies and Culture &nbsp; 2. Human Capital &amp; Research a. Education i. Expenditure on Education ii. Government Funding per Student iii. School Life Expectancy iv. PISA Scales in Reading, Maths, and Science v. Student-Teacher Ratio b. Tertiary Education i. Tertiary Environment ii. Graduates in Science and Engineering iii. Tertiary Inbound Mobility c. Research and Development (R&amp;D) i. Researchers ii. Gross Expenditure on R&amp;D iii. Global Corporate R&amp;D Investors iv. Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) University Ranking &nbsp; 3. Infrastructure a. Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) i. ICT Access ii. ICT Use iii. Government Online Service iv. E-Participation b. General Infrastructure i. Electricity Output ii. Logistic Performance iii. Gross Capital Information c. Ecological Sustainability i. GDP per Unit of Energy Use ii. Environmental Performance iii. ISO 14001 Environment &nbsp; 4. Market Sophistication a. Credit i. Finance for Startups and Scaleups ii. Domestic Credit to Private Sector iii. Loans from Microfinance Institutions b. Investment i. Market Capitalization ii. Venture Capital (VC) Investors iii. VC Recipients iv. VC Received c. Trade, Diversification, and Market Scale i. Applied Tariff Rate ii. Domestic Industry Diversification iii. Domestic Market Scale &nbsp; 5. Business Sophistication a. Knowledge Workers i. Knowledge-Intensive Employment ii. Firms Offering Formal Training iii. GERD Performed by Business iv. GERD Financed by Business v. Females Employed with Advanced Degrees b. Innovation Linkages i. University-Industry R&amp;D Collaboration ii. State of Cluster Development iii. GERD Financed by Abroad iv. Joint Venture\/ Strategic Alliance v. Patent Families c. Knowledge Absorption i. Intellectual Property Payments ii. High-Tech Imports iii. ICT Services Imports iv. FDI Net Inflows v. Research Talent &nbsp; 6. Knowledge &amp; Technology Outputs\u00a0 a. Knowledge Creation i. Patents by Origin ii. PCT Patents by Origin iii. Utility Models by Origin iv. Scientist and Technical Articles v. Citable Documents H-Index b. Knowledge Impact i. Labor Productivity Growth ii. Unicorn Valuation iii. Software Spending iv. High-Tech Manufacturing c. Knowledge Diffusion i. Intellectual Property Receipts ii. Production and Export Complexity iii. High-Tech Exports iv. ICT Services Exports v. ISO 9001 Quality &nbsp; 7. Creative Outputs\u00a0 a. Intangible Assets i. Intangible Asset Intensity ii. Trademarks by Origin iii. Global Brand Value iv. Industrial Design by Origin b. Creative Goods and Services i. Cultural and Creative Services Exports ii. National Feature Films iii. Entertainment and Media Market iv. Creative Goods Exports c. Online Creativity i. Generic Top-Level Domains ii. Country-Code Top-Level Domains iii. GitHub Commits iv. Mobile App Creation &nbsp; Switzerland tops the GII rankings for the 13th year in a row, followed by Sweden, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. The top 10 economies are all high-income countries. Still, several middle-income countries are also performing well in innovation, such as Indonesia joining China, T\u00fcrkiye, India, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and Vietnam as the most impressive innovation climbers of the last decade. &nbsp; &nbsp; For the 13th consecutive year, Switzerland ranks first in the GII. It is the global leader in innovation outputs, ranking first in both Knowledge and technology outputs and Creative outputs. Sweden overtakes the United States (US) to climb to second position. Sweden leads in Business sophistication (1st), Infrastructure (2nd), and Human capital and research (3rd). It holds top positions for its Researchers (1st) and Knowledge-intensive employment (3rd). The United States continues to head the league table of scoring best in the world in 13 of the 80 GII 2023 innovation indicators. It is number one in the world in indicators that include Global corporate R&amp;D investors, Venture capital received, the quality of its universities, the combined valuation of its unicorn companies (a new GII indicator), software spending, and the value of corporate Intangible asset intensity. &nbsp; Singapore enters the top five leading in South East Asia, East Asia, and Oceania (SEAO) region economies. Finland (6th) gets closer to the top five, gaining three ranks this year. It comes top worldwide in Infrastructure (1st). &nbsp; Denmark (9th) and the Republic of Korea (10th) remain in the top 10. France (11th) gets closer, improving one rank this year, while Japan remains strong as the 13th most innovative economy. Israel re-enters the top 15, reaching 14th place. &nbsp; &nbsp; After a rapid ascent, gaining 23 positions over the last decade, China ranks 12th this year, dropping one rank relative to 2022. China remains the sole middle-income economy to secure a position among the top 30, retaining 3rd place in the SEAO region and top spot in the upper middle-income group. Apart from China, there are only four other middle-income economies among the top 40 economies, namely, Malaysia (36th), Bulgaria (38th), T\u00fcrkiye (39th) and India (40th). &nbsp; Standout Countries\u2019 4-year Innovation Surge, 2019\u20132023 In the last four years, and since the pandemic, Saudi Arabia (48th), Brazil (49th), Mauritius (57th), Indonesia (61st), and Pakistan (88th) ascended most in the GII, in order of their rank progression.\u00a0 &nbsp; &nbsp; In 2019, Indonesia was ranked 85th with 29.7 points. In 2020, although the points decreased to 26.5, the ranking remained at number 85. The increase was only one point in the following years (2021-2022), but it was enough to increase the ranking to the top 75. Of course, The peak this year is 61st place with 31.3 points. &nbsp; Indonesia makes marked improvements in innovation outputs, notably in Knowledge Creation and Online Creativity. It excels in&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4378,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[81],"tags":[16,35,43,48,51,68,75,77,79,91,104,114,115,145],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4372"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4372"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4372\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4379,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4372\/revisions\/4379"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4378"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affa.co.id\/global\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}